Thread: Parallelogram

  1. #16
    Registered User red_baron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    274
    try finding the slope of the diaganols
    ¿Red Baron?

    "Imagination is more important than knowledge"
    -Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

    Check out my games!

    [code] /* dont forget code tags! */ [/code]

  2. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    23
    Here's a diagram I drew.

    A (0, b)----------------C (a+c, b)


    B (-c, 0) )----------------D (a, 0)

    4 different points on the graph. Point B is in quadrant II. The other points are in quardant I.


    I'm trying to find the slopes of AD and BC. If the slopes are negative reciprocal, then they must be perpendicular. Is there another way to prove that the diagonals are perpendicular without using their slopes?
    Last edited by NavyBlue; 10-03-2002 at 07:17 PM.

  3. #18
    Registered User red_baron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    274
    finding the slopes is the easiest way i know of... btw what grade are u in?
    ¿Red Baron?

    "Imagination is more important than knowledge"
    -Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

    Check out my games!

    [code] /* dont forget code tags! */ [/code]

  4. #19
    Registered User moi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    946

    Re: Parallelogram

    Originally posted by NavyBlue
    How do you prove the diagonals of a parallelogram are perpendicular to each other, meaning that the diagonals' slopes are negative reciprocal of each other.
    you don't because it's not nessecarily true. only rhombusses, a subset of paralellograms where all four sides are the same length, is this nessecarily true for.
    hello, internet!

  5. #20
    I lurk
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,361
    I don't really see getting help as cheating... it's the same as answering questions on the C++ board about programming.

    Try #math on DALnet (irc) for your math problems, they're avid about not doing peoples homework for them (kinda like us)... but they're friendly and willing to help if you want help and not just an answer.

  6. #21
    Lead Moderator kermi3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1998
    Posts
    2,595
    I don't really see getting help as cheating... it's the same as answering questions on the C++ board about programming.
    I don't think you should answer questions about things that are graded assignments either. Unless teacher doesn't care of course but...

    I don't see how it's not cheating...

    Every honor code I've ever been under has been under has been to the effect of:

    I have not (nor will I) given or recieved unauthorized aide on this assignment
    Now if asking for help on a program without asking for help, or something like this isn't "unauthorized aide" I don't know what is.
    Kermi3

    If you're new to the boards, welcome and reading this will help you get started.
    Information on code tags may be found here

    - Sandlot is the highest form of sport.

  7. #22
    Green Member Cshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    892
    Bah you win Cshot. But when proving a therom like this you shouldn't use a "special kind". You should use the most generic you have.
    I think the extra credit problem was a trick question. He wants to prove that the diagonals of a parallelogram are always perpendicular. So in this case you show proof by contradiction with one case. If you wanted to prove his statement you would have to prove that all paralelograms, even the "special kind" have this property.

    Can't think right now but the only 2 parallelograms that have that property is the square and rhombus. Hope I'm right.
    Try not.
    Do or do not.
    There is no try.

    - Master Yoda

  8. #23
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,823
    > is the square and rhombus.

    And since a square is a rhombus, that only leaves one, doesn't it?

    The diagonals of a parallelogram are only perpendicular if it's a rhombus, Navy

  9. #24
    Green Member Cshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    892
    Good point cheez. Been so long since I've taken geometry...(shuts out that part of memory)
    Try not.
    Do or do not.
    There is no try.

    - Master Yoda

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. parallelogram for statement issues
    By surfingbum18 in forum C Programming
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 10:14 PM
  2. Parallelogram
    By clipsit in forum C Programming
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-05-2008, 08:25 PM
  3. newbie needs help
    By surfingbum18 in forum C Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-25-2007, 12:48 AM