Thread: Linux, whats it like?

  1. #1
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331

    Linux, whats it like?

    Ok i no many people hold linux high above windows yadda yadda. Now as i am new to c++ i have the option to opt into windows programming or linux. I see windows as having more opportunites but i want to try linux.

    So what is linux like?
    What version is best?
    Any info i should know before i get it?

  2. #2
    Registered User The Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    788
    >>So what is linux like?

    Linux is a good OS, but I have never came across a decent GUI for linux. I'm running Windows XP and Mandrake Linux 8.0 and I hardly use linux (That's probably 'cos i'm so used to Windows and don't have the time to learn linux).

    >>What version is best?
    I don't know which version of linux is best.

    >>Any info i should know before i get it?
    Well try and learn as much as you can, seriously, before messing around with linux.

  3. #3
    Registered User PostCode's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    12
    I would recommend using either RedHat 7.2 or the latest stable, that is, non-beta, Mandrake. Both provide an easy to use install interface that's GUI driven. Mandrake being the better of the two for implementing a multi boot format, that is, booting to more than one OS on the drive. RedHat and Mandrake both offer a huge selection of programming tools to work with as wel, KDevelop and Kate for KDE and Glade and gIDE for Gnome are a few of the many that come with both. EMACSMany many other tools are also available for many different needs, From C and C++ to HTMl and php/mysql. Debuggers and many other tools also come standard with nearly every distibution of Linux.

    There are many other distibutions of Linux out there, like Slackware, Debian, RemondLinux, and many more. However, not all of them are meant for first time users. A complete undersanding of the cli is needed to install a few of these. A good familiarity with the lower aspects is also needed to setup the partitions correctly. Linux speaks in blocks, not bytes, and the partitions are setup quite a bit differently. This is the reason I recommend RedHat or Mandrake as they both will do all of this for you.

    I would recommend installing either on a drive by itself and use that drive just to fart around with it. There are many sites out there that a person can go to for help with Linux too.

    TInyminds.org

    Linux Junior

    Linuxnewbie.org

    These are just a few of the places out there that offer help or guidence for those new to the Linux operating system.

    Last but not least. Patience. If you don't know it, learn it. Linux is not an easy OS to pick up. The learning curve is steep. Don't expect to master it in a week or even a few months. Take you time and expect problems to arise. Most of all, have fun. It's a very powerful OS with many features and it only grows more powerful with each new kernel.

  4. #4
    Just because ygfperson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    2,490

    Re: Linux, whats it like?

    Originally posted by Ride -or- Die
    So what is linux like?
    a roasting hippopotamus.

    it's not bad. i'm using it right now. with redhat or mandrake, you don't even have to admit you're using it. (it will look like windows). using linux is the easy part; doing anything in it is hard.

    some vocabulary --
    terminal or xterm or tty: your terminal. you'll probably be using the bash shell. research into basic commands, like ls, which shows the directory.
    kernel: the piece of code which is linux. you can create your own and fine tune it, if you have the source and expertise. it's one of the better feelings when working with linux.
    xfree86: linux's gui. GNOME or KDE can be used on top of this to create a nice interface.
    daemon: a program which resides in the background, and does needed tasks every once in a while, like updatedb, which refreshes the current directory database.
    super-user: the root user, who has absolute control. you normally log in as the regular user. the regular user cannot screw things up. (note that i'm saying there's a remote possibility, not an impossibility)


    What version is best?
    redhat or mandrake
    (btw, redhat 7.3 is out now)
    Any info i should know before i get it?
    it's mainly a trial and error thing. when in doubt, take down notes and research it. if you decide to install individual packages, you will encounter many, many things you have never even heard about before. there are often many ways to do anything.

    there is nothing you can do to prepare you for it. (aside from 6-month intensive courses...)

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    18
    Hmm, what's linux like...it's just like other operating systems, it's renoun for it's flexibility (open source) & people talk about it's security, though that arguement can go on for lots of pages, being able re-compile your kernel/edit whatever you want.

    It's not very user friendly, the GUI on most distro sucks pretty bad but the linux community is getting there. It's a good programming environment. All the the compilers you could ever want to use come with linux, fresh out the box (no downloading software to do your programming) - e.g. your c/c++ compilers. The support for linux is very vast as well as good documentation. As stated above, it's a steep learning curve. It's very much different from windows, windows does everything for you, all you have to do is point and click where as linux, the steps would be left to you (e.g. compiling/installing software etc).

    I'd have to say go for Redhat or Mandrake, Redhat & mandrake is a newbies linux (like mandrake). Though i haven't used mandrake i can only comment on my experiences with redhat. Red hat a very large hardware compatability list, it also has a good package management system (RPM). It also has a very easy to use up2date program that updates outdated/insecure programs. It also downloads the latest kernel and installs them all for you, all you have to do is wait for it to download and process and your up2date. Redhat is kinda becoming the linux version of windows, if your looking for a command line linux & do everything yourself linux go for Slackware (very nice, though it's the probably the hardest to learn as it's the most unix like OS), else go for Redhat or Mandrake.

    Here's some links that i use -

    www.linuxquestions.org – speaks for itself but has a great bulletin for Linux questions
    http://www.tldp.org/ - great Linux documentation project
    www.linux.box.sk -nice site for Linux news & some software on there
    www.linuxsecurity.com – names talks for itself
    www.freshmeat.net - great software site
    www.sourceforge.net – nice software site with lots of different projects on there
    www.nsa.gov/selinux – Security enhanced Linux, you gota check this out to judge for yourself.
    http://www.lids.org/ - Linux intrusion detection system
    http://www.linux.org/docs/howto.html – a few tutorials
    http://www.linuxgeek.net/beginners/
    http://www.linuxnewbie.org/
    http://linuxsurvival.com/
    http://www.linuxguruz.org/
    http://www.linuxjournal.com/
    http://new.linuxnow.com/
    http://www.linuxhq.com/
    http://www.linuxtoday.com/
    http://lwn.net/
    http://linuxiso.org - download linux (has every linux you could think of).


    Good look with learning linux.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    254
    imho the only distro worth your while is debian 3.0 and fluxbox or blackbox (note fluxbox and blackbox are not linux distros but window manadgers)
    Last edited by ZerOrDie; 09-15-2002 at 10:32 AM.

  7. #7
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    wow what a response!

    ok now i think i want Mandrake 8.0(?) because alot of my buds are die-hard *nix users and say that any dieharder will tell u redhat sux.

    I am really undecided but i do know i will be dual booting with windows xp. Now i know when u dual boot windows 98/nt that the nt(i THINK been a while) has to be loaded first, do i need winodws or nix on first?

  8. #8
    Microsoft. Who? MethodMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,198
    I have a dual boot with windows ME, and Mandrake 8.1, although I have a problem with it right now.

    My friend has Windows XP, and Mandrake 8.1.

    I used Mandrake before, and then formated, and havent used it since, but I didnt really get into it. I use kde, and it makes things easy, but Linux makes you mount such devices as your floppy and cd drives, which I never really did.

    However, I hope to have linux as the only operatins system on my computer one day, I just havent had the time to fool around with it yet.
    -MethodMan-

    Your Move:Life is a game, Play it; Life is a challenge, Meet it; Life is an opportunity, capture it.

    Homepage: http://www.freewebs.com/andy_moog/home.html

  9. #9
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    i am dloading mandrak 8.2 now...whats the RC??

  10. #10
    Banned Troll_King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,784
    Mandrake 8.2 is awesome. I like the GUI better than MS Windows. It's also better for programming in C/C++ at an advanced level.

    Download the 3 iso images and burn each to cd as iso cd images. The installation is not very difficult, just make sure to install it on hdb1 instead of hda1, also use GRUB and install it on the master boot record (MBR). That will allow you to duel boot. I duel booted with Win2k but I eventually erased Win2k completely because it sucks.

  11. #11
    Evil Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    638

    Since is hasn't been mentioned...

    I'll throw in my experience with SuSE 8.0.

    I have a dual boot setup but I haven't been back to windows XP since I installed SuSE. SuSE is a german distro, and like most german engineering, is rocksolid. Throw Ximian Gnome on top of that and you have a high-quality workstation with great groupware and connectivity software, that is very easy for someone with little to no Linux knowledge to get used to and productive with, provided you have someone with a bit of experience around to get it installed and running.

    SuSE with Ximian Gnome is absolutely the BEST setup if you are looking to convince your higher-ups to migrate from Windows workstations to Linux across an enterprise.

    That said, it isn't the best choice for server implementations. I don't know exactly why but I've always found Debian to be better for making any type of server. But that only matters if you want to make a server...

    If you want to learn linux GUI-first (not the best way in terms of the Big Picture, but often better for convincing people (yourself included) to migrate) then I would definitely recommend SuSE with straight up Gnome 1.4 or Ximian Gnome.

  12. #12
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    well this one is only one iso.

    I'll get grub soon, thnx.

  13. #13
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    did i mention i'm dloading on 56k? :P

  14. #14
    Evil Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    638
    Then another advantage of SuSE...

    The ftp installation is very efficient.

    You download a mini-iso containing just YAST and it's environment, then download only those packages you want upon installation, with the option to download more at a later time.

    EDIT - In fact if memory serves there was an "install of a couple of floppy disks" option.
    Last edited by Imperito; 09-15-2002 at 03:32 PM.

  15. #15
    Banned Troll_King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,784
    If it's one huge file than you can't burn it to cd. I've never seen it as one huge file. I downloaded it as 3 iso image files, each about 630 MB in size. If you have a 56k connection, you might not be able to download it. The download can contain errors, and you have to use the MD5SUM utility. I didn't have any problems but I have a cable connection. BTW RH 7.3 is a beta, good thing you went with Mandrake 8.2 (if you can download it!).

    I tried RH7.3 and it was good in most respects but I had problems with video, and konqueror, but those are not apparent in Mandrake 8.2. The even numbered versions are the most stable.

    If a friend has a cable connection, get them to download it and burn the 3 cds for you!


    quote:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Originally posted by Imperito
    Then another advantage of SuSE...

    The ftp installation is very efficient.

    You download a mini-iso containing just YAST and it's environment, then download only those packages you want upon installation, with the option to download more at a later time.

    EDIT - In fact if memory serves there was an "install of a couple of floppy disks" option.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    I'll be trying out some new distro's in the future, maybe I'll try SUSE. I'm happy with Mandrake at the moment! Have you tried Mandrake? lol.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Thinking of upgrading to linux...
    By Yarin in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-24-2009, 11:40 AM
  2. Wireless Network Linux & C Testbed
    By james457 in forum Networking/Device Communication
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 11:03 AM
  3. Dabbling with Linux.
    By Hunter2 in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-21-2005, 04:17 PM
  4. installing linux for the first time
    By Micko in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-06-2004, 05:15 AM