View Poll Results: What compiler do you use

Voters
58. You may not vote on this poll
  • Dev c++ 4

    12 20.69%
  • Borland (free version)

    8 13.79%
  • Microsoft Visual C++ 6 Enterprise

    18 31.03%
  • other

    20 34.48%

Thread: what do you use

  1. #46
    Much older and wiser Fountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Engeeeerland
    Posts
    1,158
    my borland was nice 'n' cheap as a student licensed copy...cant really complain about it!

    Works for me..
    Such is life.

  2. #47
    Registered User Cruxus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    87
    I marked other.

    My main compiler is Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0, Standard Edition, which was only $109 compared to the $2,000 or whatever the Enterprise Edition costed at the time. A second compiler I have is Borland (Inprise) C++Builder 5.0, Standard. On my Linux computer, I use GCC 2.95.2 (g++), which was what came with my distribution.

  3. #48
    Registered User Cruxus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    87
    Klinerr1, I'm not sure about the new Microsoft Visual C++ .NET (7.0), but the differences between the various editions of Visual C++ 6.0 were kind of like this:

    Introductory Edition: Like Standard Edition, but you cannot legally redistribute your executables. A dialogue box pops up, even in console (text-only) applications.

    Standard Edition: You can legally redistribute your executables! Here's the big one: The compiler does not do optimizations--not for file size, not for run-time speed. Microsoft's documentation says that the MFC library cannot be statically linked into your executable, but it seems the static libraries are included. InstallShield Express (an installer-creation utiltity) is not included. The full MSDN Library help and documentation system is included.

    Professional Edition: The compiler does optimize. InstallShield Express is included. If you're not a C++ newbie, you'd probably want this edition.

    Enterprise Edition: An SQL Server, Developer Edition, with debugger is included. A few other tools that would probably only be of use if you develop in-house, distributed applications for businesses is included. In my opinion, you'd be wasting a lot of money paying for features you'd probably never use.

    I'm not sure about version 7.0 (.NET), but I would think the differences between the editions would be similar. (It was only Visual C++ 5.0, Learning/Standard Edition, that would not let you redistribute the executables. Microsoft changed back to let you in version 6.0.)

  4. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    23
    I use DevC++ but I don't know what version i'm using.
    o.o

  5. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    267
    I'm an MSVC++ 6 Enterprise user.... I got a 60% student discount though, and next season when I buy MSCV++.NET I'll get another big discount, which is the only reason I can afford it!

  6. #51
    In The Light
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    598
    howdy,
    Borland C++ Builder 5 on the windoze side
    gcc 2.96 on the linux side / kdevelope as an ide

    M.R.
    I don't like you very much. Please post a lot less.
    Cheez
    *and then*
    No, I know you were joking. My point still stands.

  7. #52
    x4000 Ruski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Outer Space!
    Posts
    542
    Originally posted by Unreg1stered


    The original version is for UNIX, but there's a ported version for Windows as well.
    How good is it? Does it have powerful compilers/debuggers/etc??
    what does signature stand for?

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed