Thread: What do YOU want in a OS?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    17

    Talking What do YOU want in a OS?

    The questions is, What do YOU want in a OS.

    Say anything about what you want to see in a OS. From video display to networking just say what you want to see in a OS.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    pacific northwest
    Posts
    37
    i wan't security. built from the ground up around cryptopgrahy. i don't want to have applications that layer over the OS. i want the guts to already have it.

    i also want standards... for everything. portabilty among architecture is also important.

    NetBSD is my OS of choice. (http://www.netbsd.org/)

  3. #3
    Has a Masters in B.S.
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,263
    i restate:
    a browser that is,

    A. Not integrated into the OS
    B. Allows the disabling of pop-ups(heh)

    telnet, std windows network stuff such as ping, tracert, ect...
    an enablable FTP server and the like...

    hope im not askin to much...
    ADVISORY: This users posts are rated CP-MA, for Mature Audiences only.

  4. #4
    aurë entuluva! mithrandir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,209
    I don't know really. I can't think of anything more you'd need that's not already in most OSes.

  5. #5
    .
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    598
    1. Low system requiments
    2. Windows Drive desgnation- C:\
    3. Sercuity
    4. Tons of features that are chosen to be instaled or not instaled.
    5. Networking
    6. A basic compiler (I see no need for a C++ compiler just something for the people to get intrduced to programming)

    Now for a perfect name:

    Doors.
    To Err Is To Be Human. To Game Is Divine!"

  6. #6
    Disagreeably Disagreeable
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    711
    What do I want in an OS? Hmm...that's easy.

    Just take BeOS, then give it 800% more hardware support (drivers and such), and back it with a company or organization that will care for it.

    No support for DLL's (evil, useless conceptions) would be another plus also.

    These are the high points:

    Full GUI boot in <10 seconds.
    Multimedia support for every format there is.
    SMP (Multiple processors) support.
    64-bit Journaled FS similar if not identical to the BFS.
    100% Stability. The kind Windows can't even dream about.
    User-friendliness.
    Excellent System API.

    Those are the things I would like to see more of in OS's.

    Also, I'd like to be able to watch 8+ full length MPG's simeltaneously without glitches or system instability on a PII 266. Don't say it can't be done, I can convey otherwise

  7. #7
    Anti-Terrorist
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    mming, Game DevelopmentCSR >€&<>&2Minimization of boolean functions, PROM,PLA design >‚&0>ƒ&WA, USA guitar, dogsCommercial Aviation >„&>>…&USAProgramming
    Posts
    742
    More diversity in the market. Right now the choice is Microsoft or Microsoft. I would like a more secure operating system and I think they have a long way to go. Current OS's are not secure. It would be great if the client server architecture could be as secure and stable as the mainframe architecture. I don't like the hastle of buying a new OS and worrying about whether or not it will even work with my hardware. They need to stop the terrorists and get rid of product activation.
    I compile code with:
    Visual Studio.NET beta2

  8. #8
    Lead Moderator kermi3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1998
    Posts
    2,595
    Three words....No Blue Screens that is all i ask
    Kermi3

    If you're new to the boards, welcome and reading this will help you get started.
    Information on code tags may be found here

    - Sandlot is the highest form of sport.

  9. #9
    l'Anziano DavidP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Plano, Texas, United States
    Posts
    2,743
    Three words....No Blue Screens that is all i ask
    Yes! That is the best thing I have read this entire day....I totally and utterly agree with you. The BSOD (an abbreviation used for it quite often around here) is the worst thing an OS can have...

    Back to the topic...

    I would like:

    -Stability
    -Security
    -Ease of use
    -Efficient. frees up memory well.
    -Support for lots of programs. It would be cool if it could support Windows, Linux, Mac, etc. totally without having to use any shells or anything...
    -internet browser not integrated like internet explorer is with windows (although i must say i sure do like IE 6...netscape has always been my favorite though, and will continue to be my favorite).

    All in all, Windows XP satisfies me...havent stalled once...which is something new...runs efficiently...so much better than 95...
    My Website

    "Circular logic is good because it is."

  10. #10
    Disagreeably Disagreeable
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    711
    I've heard great things about XP (compared to previous versions of Windows). Some other BeOS freaks are telling me that it is very close to getting a competition with BeOS. I've never used it myself. David, is it worth the money?

  11. #11
    l'Anziano DavidP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Plano, Texas, United States
    Posts
    2,743
    yes
    My Website

    "Circular logic is good because it is."

  12. #12
    Registered User mfc2themax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    347
    >yes<

    no
    mfc2themax-Creator of all that is.

  13. #13
    &TH of undefined behavior Fordy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    5,793
    >>BeOS freaks are telling me that it is very close to getting a competition with BeOS.


    LOL..... I would like to have a try of beos oneday....just to say I had

  14. #14
    Anti-Terrorist
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    mming, Game DevelopmentCSR >€&<>&2Minimization of boolean functions, PROM,PLA design >‚&0>ƒ&WA, USA guitar, dogsCommercial Aviation >„&>>…&USAProgramming
    Posts
    742
    Since you tried Win2k Hillbillie, I'd imagine that you know about XP already. The only question is about the .NET framework which nobody seems to talk about. This is a 'fundamental' change. Basically XP is thowing itself at the internet for good or bad.
    I compile code with:
    Visual Studio.NET beta2

  15. #15
    Registered User rick barclay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    835
    I would like the ability to read my e-mail and web pages without
    the fear of being infected by a virus.

    I can't think of anything else right now. OS's are stable. People are not.

    rick barclay
    No. Wait. Don't hang up!

    This is America calling!

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Detecting if OS is Windows???
    By Ktulu in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-19-2006, 02:49 AM
  2. a simple OS
    By DavidP in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-06-2004, 10:47 PM
  3. Linux OS to Windows OS code
    By sw9830 in forum C Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-28-2003, 03:11 PM
  4. How do they compile code for an OS ?
    By Nutshell in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 03-28-2002, 12:16 AM