>>RB
But if anyone here would take the time study the life and actions of the the prophet Mohammed they would find him (1) a murderer, (2) a torturer, (3) a child rapist, (4) a robber, (5) a consummate Bedouin Arab, and more.<<
>>RB
It's about Jesus vs. Muhammad and which prophet really lived up to the preachings of his respective Word. Jesus never sent an army to kill and conquer an unsuspecting enemy. Jesus never persecuted those who disagreed with him. Jesus never stole. He never took on 14 wives and countless other concubines. He never urged anyone to kill and steal in God's name. Jesus never did any of those things; Muhammad did every one. And more.<<
So Christianity is better than Islam because JC is better than M?
My point was that no matter what these people said it is how their followers INTERPRET it here and now. You want Muslims to be accountable because Mohammad was flawed. But complain that I want Christianity to be accountable because your priests rape children, you kill indiscriminately in revenge and ignore the small evil they do, in the name of, 'the greater good'.
Least Muslims are following the Koran (which tells them to extract revenge) unlike Christians who selectively ignore Jesus' teachings (should be turning the other cheek).
"It is easier for a camel to pass thru the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven"
>>RB
The Christians who resided in Damascus, Alexandria, Aleppo, Jersusalem and elsewhere did nothing to provoke their Islamic conquerors, and those Christians had every right to defend and try to take back their land just the same as Palestinians claim to be doing to day.
So the native American Indians (or Indigenous Australian Aborigines) have a right to take back their land that we conquered? And we should send tanks against them if they do?
