oxymoronlist.com
Attacking civilians violently for a political statement. Seems pretty straight forward to me. Don't even start to say that terrorism isn't a threat and that what we should really do is disarm, that isn't even related to terrorism. Unless you plan on going into UK, Ireland, and the entire middle east, disarm everyone there, and plan to get out alive.Any words like 'terrorist' and 'freedom fighter' are entirely subjective.
Terrorism = everyone loses. I don't get how anyone can justify it so nonchalantly.
Anyway, I don't really care who loses face over this, certainly not any of our agencies that failed to prevent 9/11. Some heads ought to roll and the government(s) should not settle back into BSness as usual.
*sigh* It's late.
Allegro precompiled Installer for Dev-C++, MSVC, and Borland: http://galileo.spaceports.com/~springs/
hey now... why are we getting back to the topic all of a sudden... I was in the middle of a ........ing match with ß!!!!!!!!!
top-terrorist
When I close my eyes nobody can see me...
anti-terror-war
When I close my eyes nobody can see me...
Sober Irishman
Football (American version)
-
advanced BASIC
almost exactly
act naturally
living dead
what about,
Thank God I'm an atheist?
military intelligence
friendly fire
standard deviation
non-dairy creamer
linear curve
sweet tart