Well, I think I finally understand what you're saying, so there is some agreement. I'm glad 'good composition' means 'good quality'.
The point about animals is pretty interesting. I've learned some of that before, but it's also expressed in a different way when we consider all the noise we humans make. A bird's song might be music to another animal, but that's in the context of their environment. When animals confront sounds not in their habitat they get instinctual and wouldn't react most of the time. You could train them to behave a certain way, but that doesn't reflect an animal's opinion.
I wouldn't use their lack of human intelligence in attempt to prove your point, but the psychology here goes against your point.
Still I understand what you mean. If an alien civilization shared with us its music, we may not appreciate it. We might also be intellectually inferior or superior, whatever best fits your theory. Interesting correlation, if a disheartening one.
Convenient examples must die.
I'll get to the point in a minute, but you should really try the titles I listed, if only to see if you like them. It might be nice to hear something that means something to a lot of people, or in one case, just me.
While we would agree here I doubt that is an objective scale; it can't be. Preference entirely determines how you build the hierarchy of quality music, and people's preferences usually change when they mature. I'm sure you realize this, by the way, it's just that your starved for something your ear can appreciate. I can sympathize with that. You're welcome to share your best music with anyone and foster a similar desire in them, but try not to be disappointed if they go their own way. I wasn't gonna stop you from the beginning, hombre.
That's all I had to say.