1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksTitle says it all
Does anyone know any?
And please not that DevC++...
It gives too many errors...
Please move the thread if its in the wrong section
This is a discussion on A C++ compiler for Windows 7 x64? within the Windows Programming forums, part of the Platform Specific Boards category; Title says it all Does anyone know any? And please not that DevC++... It gives too many errors... Please move ...
Title says it all
Does anyone know any?
And please not that DevC++...
It gives too many errors...
Please move the thread if its in the wrong section
Originally Posted by Fordy
Quite a quick reply
A big thanks mate
Visual Studio is another popular alternative. It's an IDE, so it comes with all the tools you need to start programming.
For information on how to enable C++11 on your compiler, look here.
よく聞くがいい！私は天才だからね！ ^_^
But the Express edition (the only free one) doesn't have an x64 compiler.
All the buzzt!
CornedBee
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
I think Pelles also has a 64 bit version for free - Pelles C - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
News to me.
Still, it is unclear whether the topic implies a 64-bit compiler or simply a compiler that works on 64-bit Windows.
For information on how to enable C++11 on your compiler, look here.
よく聞くがいい！私は天才だからね！ ^_^
Visual C++ Editions
See under "Compiler". Express only contains the 32-bit x86 compiler. But you are right, the original question wasn't clear.
All the buzzt!
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
It looks like it is possible: can't compile a 64-bit project in visual c++ express 2010
Though, it looks like a pain. Not sure why Microsoft would eliminate 64-bit compilation from Visual Studio Express...
For information on how to enable C++11 on your compiler, look here.
よく聞くがいい！私は天才だからね！ ^_^
Because Express is meant for hobbyists, and they don't need more than 2GB of address space in MS's opinion? Just like they apparently don't need to develop desktop apps anymore.
All the buzzt!
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
64-bit operating system were invented years ago, but seemingly there is little benefit to upgrading to 64-bit applications. It's just ... wrong.
I can actually kind of relate to Microsoft's decision (and agree) to restrict newest VS to Metro only. That way, we'll get lots and lots of less crapware that looks mega-ugly and which screws up your computer. With Metro, there will be less crapware, at least.
*shrug* Oh well. We'll see how this turns out. Windows 8 along with the newest VS seems to be under a lot of critique.
For information on how to enable C++11 on your compiler, look here.
よく聞くがいい！私は天才だからね！ ^_^
So, beautiful crapware is better than mega-ugly crapware ?
Manasij Mukherjee | gcc-4.8.0 @Arch Linux
Slow and Steady wins the race... if and only if :
1.None of the other participants are fast and steady.
2.The fast and unsteady suddenly falls asleep while running !
If everything else is equal, then yes. But like I said, it also means less crapware, because less things can go wrong.
For information on how to enable C++11 on your compiler, look here.
よく聞くがいい！私は天才だからね！ ^_^
The new VS is only limited to Metro via a lack of 'normal' Win32 projects and a single config file setting which enforces the WinRT switches for the compiler. Once you turn that off, you get normal non-WinRT binaries.
Obviously it isn't the same slick experience as previous incarnations, and no doubt they've made it harder to create desktop apps with Express, but it's not quite impossible... yet.
It's as if they thought VS Express was actually a mistake, and are looking for a plausible reason to kill it off, isn't it?
Code://try //{ if (a) do { f( b); } while(1); else do { f(!b); } while(1); //}
