Thread: Windows Server 2003 Vs. Mac OS X

  1. #16
    unleashed alphaoide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    696
    OS X on PC or Win XP on Mac by utilizing some sort of emulator probably won't give you accurate performance. I'd probably search for as much as possible unbiased comparison on two platforms on the Internet.
    Last edited by alphaoide; 11-13-2004 at 06:59 PM.
    source: compsci textbooks, cboard.cprogramming.com, world wide web, common sense

  2. #17
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    you cant have both, unless your rich.

  3. #18
    Lonewolf
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by RoD
    you cant have both, unless your rich.
    Actually all I have to do is buy Mac OS X. I have like 3 Windows Versions on CDs and that includes Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition.

    BTW, I'm not trying to show off. Sorry if it sounds like I am bragging.
    COMPILER: Borland 5 ( trying to get MV C++ ); LANGUAGE(s): English, Vietnamese, and basic German;
    Current IDE: Dev C++ 5 (Beta)

  4. #19
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    your missing the point.

    YOU CANNOT PUT A MAC OPERATING SYSTEM ON A REGULAR PC. IT WILL ONLY WORK ON A MAC. YOU CANNOT PUT WINDOWS ON A MAC PC, IT WILL ONLY WORK ON PC.

    Better?

  5. #20
    Lonewolf
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    24
    Oh i see. You know, I've always been interested in Linux. Maybe I should install Gentoo Stage 3 on the new PC with my DSL connection. I want RedHat, but its discontinued .....
    COMPILER: Borland 5 ( trying to get MV C++ ); LANGUAGE(s): English, Vietnamese, and basic German;
    Current IDE: Dev C++ 5 (Beta)

  6. #21
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331

  7. #22
    Lonewolf
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by RoD
    Last time I checked, it was closed... Fedora Project was the only thing available than....
    COMPILER: Borland 5 ( trying to get MV C++ ); LANGUAGE(s): English, Vietnamese, and basic German;
    Current IDE: Dev C++ 5 (Beta)

  8. #23
    unleashed alphaoide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    696
    I run the newly-released Fedora Core 3 http://fedora.redhat.com . pretty slick.
    source: compsci textbooks, cboard.cprogramming.com, world wide web, common sense

  9. #24
    Yes, my avatar is stolen anonytmouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    2,544
    OS-X is based on FreeBSD. The OS-X core, Darwin, can be installed on X86 (although for what purpose, I'm not sure).
    Last edited by anonytmouse; 11-14-2004 at 02:04 AM.

  10. #25
    Lonewolf
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    24
    I hear that Red Hat 9 was the last version... either way, its too big to download even with DSL. I think I'll just fork over 10 bucks and get it on CD.
    COMPILER: Borland 5 ( trying to get MV C++ ); LANGUAGE(s): English, Vietnamese, and basic German;
    Current IDE: Dev C++ 5 (Beta)

  11. #26
    ---
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,379
    fedora core 3 is very nice but i think gentoo is much more rewarding (as long as you can get it working)

  12. #27
    Lonewolf
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by sand_man
    fedora core 3 is very nice but i think gentoo is much more rewarding (as long as you can get it working)
    Last time I tried installing Gentoo, it was almost impossible. I tried 10 times and each try failed. Their documentation should be more clear. But hey, maybe I'll try again?
    COMPILER: Borland 5 ( trying to get MV C++ ); LANGUAGE(s): English, Vietnamese, and basic German;
    Current IDE: Dev C++ 5 (Beta)

  13. #28
    unleashed alphaoide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by Kai_Legends
    Last time I tried installing Gentoo, it was almost impossible. I tried 10 times and each try failed. Their documentation should be more clear. But hey, maybe I'll try again?
    But hey, maybe you want to try with distro that is easier to install, like FC3.
    I just thought that 10 tries are too many.
    Did you know why it always failed?
    Do you know how to make it install this time?
    source: compsci textbooks, cboard.cprogramming.com, world wide web, common sense

  14. #29
    Lonewolf
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    24
    Yeah I figured out what I did wrong last time. I left out a step, to extract the stage tarballs themselves. How much stupider can I get? lol.

    [EDIT:]
    This is going way out of topic. Somebody closed this topic plz...
    Last edited by Kai_Legends; 11-14-2004 at 08:43 PM.
    COMPILER: Borland 5 ( trying to get MV C++ ); LANGUAGE(s): English, Vietnamese, and basic German;
    Current IDE: Dev C++ 5 (Beta)

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Mac OS X Users/C programmers?
    By petermichaux in forum C Programming
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-18-2011, 06:36 AM
  2. Script errors - bool unrecognized and struct issues
    By ulillillia in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-18-2006, 04:44 AM
  3. XP Sucks
    By Darkman in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-19-2004, 07:54 PM
  4. Windows 2003 Server
    By Hexxx in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-23-2003, 05:59 PM
  5. compiled under windows, work for mac os?
    By Shadow12345 in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-09-2002, 09:55 AM