![]() |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 83
| MSVC Studio.net Pro.... $90?!? at that site, they sell two things of intrest. 1) MSVC++ Standard. $50 2) MSVStudio Professional $90 Does MSVS come with MSVC Pro? MSVC Pro is $500 by itself!!! What's wrong here? Also - is optimization really worth all the extra money? |
| punkrockguy318 is offline | |
| | #2 | |
| Hardware Engineer Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,398
| Quote:
Last edited by DougDbug; 01-08-2004 at 03:19 PM. | |
| DougDbug is offline | |
| | #3 |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Australia
Posts: 986
| I don't know about the site, but in regards to the optimisation thing, its not just extra optimisation MSVC gives you. Not having to cart around thousands of dlls/libs (Borland C++ Builder style), being able to use any library/SDK (like DirectX 9, although im not sure how well it works with DevC++) are all added bonuses MSVC gives you, because almost all of these SDKs are written for MSVC, as its the most common windows compiler out there. Personally, I got MSVC because I needed to use the socket libraries, which didn't seem to work in DevC++ (they probably do but maybe I needed to link with something, and at the time I didn't know how), nor in Borland C++ builder (which IMHO, if it didn't require hundreds of DLL's/Libraries for programs to run, would be far better than VB or MFC). I also wanted to use the DirectX SDK, which only came with instructions for MSVC, and I didn't know how to set it up for other compilers. It all depends on what sort of programs you want to make, and what requirements they need from your compiler. |
| nickname_changed is offline | |
| | #4 |
| It's full of stars Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,833
| The vast majority of MS products are available at huge discounts to academic users. In the past at least, you paid the normal price but got a refund ticket which you needed to submit via your university or whatever and got the balance back. I think Borland operate the same kind of scheme. It is a marketting ploy. If people get used to certain products at school/uni, they are more likely to use the same tools when they leave.
__________________ Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream. |
| adrianxw is offline | |
| | #5 |
| 'AlHamdulillah Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 790
| what I find interesting is that it is prof. edition for ~100 dollars. the reason that doesnt make sense is that the academic edition of MS products contains a clause that you are not allowed to release commercial products with it. I doubt it is prof. edition like they say on the site, because : 1) everywhere else, full VS pro .NET is ~600+ dollars 2) Academic edition everywhere I have looked is ~100 dollars, so it makes logical sense that on a academic site to have the acadmic version. |
| EvBladeRunnervE is offline | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trouble with MSVC, Mingw32 and Code::Blocks | Brafil | C Programming | 11 | 10-12-2009 11:34 AM |
| MSVC resource script in Dev-C++ | josh_d | Windows Programming | 0 | 03-17-2004 04:07 PM |
| MSVC behaves strange | ripper079 | C++ Programming | 4 | 10-28-2003 08:34 PM |
| GCC (cygwin) much faster than MSVC, Borland? | Sargnagel | C Programming | 15 | 08-05-2003 03:15 AM |
| Home vs. Pro | DavidP | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 5 | 01-08-2002 06:37 AM |