what is a server os??
one that i can think of is windows server 2003.
what is a server os??
one that i can think of is windows server 2003.
Yeah, and Windows 2000 server, Win NT 4 (maybe?), etc...
Most Linux kernels.
Naturally I didn't feel inspired enough to read all the links for you, since I already slaved away for long hours under a blistering sun pressing the search button after typing four whole words! - Quzah
You. Fetch me my copy of the Wall Street Journal. You two, fight to the death - Stewie
sums it up nicelyHave a BSD: FreeBSD; OpenBSD; NetBSD
I'm not a Linux user. I just thought that most distributions came with Apache or something similar. I should have said 'distros' instead of 'kernels' though.
Naturally I didn't feel inspired enough to read all the links for you, since I already slaved away for long hours under a blistering sun pressing the search button after typing four whole words! - Quzah
You. Fetch me my copy of the Wall Street Journal. You two, fight to the death - Stewie
Any computer that is hosting a resource others are using is considered a server. Even your workstation with Windows 9x, 2K, XP, Linux, etc with a shared folder is considered a server because it's serving files to others.
Yea most do come with Apache, it's great. I think there is an Apache for Windows also.
>>> I think there is an Apache for Windows also
There most definitely is, I know, I run it!
Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.
I was running Apache 2.0.44 in RedHat 8.0 and it ran great. How does Apache run in Windows in Comparison to Linux? (If you happen to know, I havent installed it on Windows yet)Originally posted by adrianxw
>>> I think there is an Apache for Windows also
There most definitely is, I know, I run it!
"What are you after - the vague post of the week award?" - Salem
IPv6 Ready.
Travel the world, meet interesting people...kill them.
Trying to fix or change something, only guaruntees and perpetuates its existence.
I don't know about angels, but it is fear that gives men wings.
The problem with wanting something is the fear of losing it, or never having it. The thought makes you weak.
E-Mail Xei
I've never run it under Linux so have no idea. It seems to run okay on my XP system. There have been a number of issues.
2.0.45 was released a month or so back which closes a couple of security holes. In the Apache community, there are those that maintain the last 1.x.xx can't remember which, is better, but 1) there are always people like that, 2) that version does not run under Windows as a service, it has to be manually started in a console.
There is also a known error that was "fixed" in version 2, however...
>>>
[Sat May 10 21:21:13 2003] [warn] (OS 64)The specified network name is no longer available. : winnt_accept: Asynchronous AcceptEx failed.
<<<
... there is the error in my error log from Saturday! It doesn't happen often, when it does, the GET or HEAD command that was coming in at the time 404's.
There are some other minor irritations, but having tried a few http servers, I would have to say this is the best.
Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.
server OS =
Server Operating System
---
NON workstation Operating System
Not necessarily, as I said earlier, any machine hosting resources being used by others is considered a server....it's serving others it's resources.Originally posted by CodeMaster
server OS =
Server Operating System
---
NON workstation Operating System
It's not a server if you are doing a client to client transfer. Both ends are considered a client then.
