C Board  

Go Back   C Board > Community Boards > Tech Board

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-24-2009, 08:18 PM   #1
Not stupid, just stupider
 
yaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Earthland
Posts: 191
Thumbs up HD difference?

I'm looking into buying a 1 TB hard drive and I'm interested in the WD Caviar Green and Black. What are the main advantages/disadvantages of these? I can get the Green for $160AUD and the Black for $170AUD. Good deal or a big rip off? I'm not really looking for performance, more just reliability.

Cheers.
yaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 08:46 PM   #2
Super Moderator
 
Bubba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,322
Green has some type of negligible power saving feature or something like it. Just get the Black and forget the green. It's WD's attempt at going green and a sad one at that. Why would I care about a few watts here and there when I'm pushing 1000 watts? Not like I'm ever going to see any benefit in my power bill b/c of a green drive.

Quote:
Helps enable eco-friendly PCs - WD Caviar Green drives yield an average drive power savings of 4-5 watts over standard desktop drives making it possible for our energy-conscious customers to build systems with higher capacities and the right balance of system performance, ensured reliability, and energy conservation. This power savings equates to reducing CO2 emission by up to 13.8 kilograms per drive per year - the equivalent of taking a car off the road for 3 days each year*. By using environmentally-conscious PCs with our WD Caviar Green drives on board, large organizations with many desktop computers can minimize their carbon footprint and save real money on electricity costs.
Then the disclaimer:

Quote:
*Assumes that a car produces 1.60 CO2 pounds per Kwatt/hours/year. Calculation of automobile emissions depends on the car's g/km emission levels and km/year of driving.
From this site:
WD Caviar Green 1 TB SATA Hard Drives ( WD10EACS )

Sounds good but I bet somehow it doesn't exactly save as much as they claim. But it's all up to you. If you think we are all doomed b/c of our current carbon emissions and really think buying eco-friendly hard drives is going to make a difference in the grand scheme of things then that is completely your decision. They spin it well enough to almost believe it. But then again I just have to make a few more runs to Best Buy or to the grocery store per year and your little hard drive's contribution to the environment has been completely negated.

Here's an idea for WD. Stop trying to swindle people into buying a hard-drive that just as well could be manufactured as the Black one yet also have the power savings and features of the Green one. I mean wouldn't someone who really 'cared' for the environment embed that type of technology into their mainline products instead of marketing them as some overpriced overhyped separate line?
__________________
I remember when The Weather Channel talked about weather, MTV played music videos, and the History Channel talked about history instead of conspiracy theories.

Last edited by Bubba; 08-24-2009 at 08:55 PM.
Bubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 08:47 PM   #3
(?<!re)tired
 
Mario F.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 6,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaya View Post
I'm not really looking for performance, more just reliability.
That's the Green. With the added benefit of more storage space (up to 2GB) and lower consumption (6 & 3 watts against 8 and 7 watts). An excellent hard drive.

The price seems high though. I'm looking into buying one myself and have seen them in the 80s to 100.

EDIT: Bubba makes some interesting points. My reasoning is concerned only with the electric bill, not the so-called green planet. In any case the difference is indeed negligible even concerning electricity costs. But every bit counts I guess. This come from someone who only buys <20 watt light bulbs.
__________________
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

Quiet Technologies... that make some noise.

Last edited by Mario F.; 08-24-2009 at 08:53 PM.
Mario F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 09:37 PM   #4
Devil's Advocate
 
SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Out of scope
Posts: 3,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
This come from someone who only buys <20 watt light bulbs.
A two packs of cigarettes daily that more than offsets all of the little bits that count.
__________________
Terms of Service
By quoting or replying directly to this post, you consent to the fact that all of the information in the post above is completely accurate and highly intelligent and no comments will be made towards its validity, thoughtlessness, and/or grammatical structure.

Violators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
SlyMaelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2009, 09:41 PM   #5
(?<!re)tired
 
Mario F.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 6,092
Well, I still didn't find a light bulb I could smoke yet
__________________
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

Quiet Technologies... that make some noise.
Mario F. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:09 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,322
According to this website, How much does electricity cost? What is a kilowatt-hour? (kWh), the average cost of electricity for US residence is 12c/kWh. That is 12/1000=0.012c/Wh. Assuming your computer is on 12hr a day, and the harddrive spends negligible time active. The difference in idle power draw is 7.8-3.7=4.1W. Difference in power draw per day would be 4.1W*12hr=49.2Wh. If you run the harddrive for 3 years, that would be 3*365.24*49.2=53909Wh, which will cost you $6.47 (that's how much the green will save over black, over 3 years of running 12hr/day 365.24days/year).

If you do a lot of I/O, though, things can be very different. Even though the green eats less power active, it will need to spend more time in active mode, since they are slower. Green may end up not saving any power at all.

I have a black and it's pretty fast (close to 100MB/s). Still nowhere near my SSD, though... .

Last edited by cyberfish; 08-25-2009 at 02:12 AM.
cyberfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 06:32 AM   #7
and the hat of sweating
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberfish View Post
If you do a lot of I/O, though, things can be very different. Even though the green eats less power active, it will need to spend more time in active mode, since they are slower. Green may end up not saving any power at all.
Kind of like those "low flow" toilets. How do they save water if you need to flush them about 2-3 times to flush everything?
__________________
"I am probably the laziest programmer on the planet, a fact with which anyone who has ever seen my code will agree." - esbo, 11/15/2008

"the internet is a scary place to be thats why i dont use it much." - billet, 03/17/2010
cpjust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 06:53 AM   #8
Woof, woof!
 
zacs7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,400
Well, just abide by this motto "If it saves the environment something, it costs you something"
__________________
My homepage | premake | vim
zacs7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 12:37 PM   #9
Mysterious C++ User
 
Elysia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,078
You need to stop thinking in lines of "if I do this, then I save this," and more like "if I and others do this, we can save a lot."
Sure, 4W can seem insignificant. But when 10 000 people save 4W, you get 40 000 W of total savings. And a lot of people tend to leave the computers on, while they really shouldn't.
So one should do a favor and go green as a role model for everyone else. But don't feel pressured to really go green if it costs too much.
__________________
Using: Microsoft Windows™ 7 Professional (x64), Microsoft Visual Studio™ 2010 Ultimate, C++0x
"Thanks Elysia. You're a programming master! How the hell do you know every thing?"
"Thanks for all your help. It's obvious yall really know what you're talking about when it comes to OOP/C++ stuff."
Quoted... at least once.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpjust
If C++ is 2 steps forward from C, then I'd say Java is 1 step forward and 2 steps back.
Elysia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 01:00 PM   #10
Not stupid, just stupider
 
yaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Earthland
Posts: 191
Ah, thanks for the replies.

My aim isn't to aid the environment, I just want a decent HD that won't die on me in the next year or so. But it looks like I'm leaning towards the black.

Thanks.
yaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:24 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,029
Also keep in mind that since the green hard drive uses less power, it also runs cooler. This will aid the drive's longevity. It your main concern is reliability, then I would go for the Green over the Black.
__________________
bit∙hub [bit-huhb] n. A source and destination for information.
bithub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:44 PM   #12
Registered User
 
carrotcake1029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 317
If you want to look for a good deal for a HDD, check out this website. Multiple times a week they post good deals on drives. They actually have a green one on the front page right now:

Slickdeals.net - The best coupons, lowest prices, and hottest deals.
carrotcake1029 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 02:44 PM   #13
Malum in se
 
abachler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by bithub View Post
Also keep in mind that since the green hard drive uses less power, it also runs cooler. This will aid the drive's longevity. It your main concern is reliability, then I would go for the Green over the Black.
That's not necessarily the way it works. A drive that is constantly spinning up and down will wear the bearings out faster than one that stays running 24/7.
__________________
Until you can build a working general purpose reprogrammable computer out of basic components from radio shack, you are not fit to call yourself a programmer in my presence. This is cwhizard, signing off.
abachler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 03:29 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by abachler View Post
That's not necessarily the way it works. A drive that is constantly spinning up and down will wear the bearings out faster than one that stays running 24/7.
I don't think the Green drive spins up and down any more or less than the other WD drives. It saves power mainly by running at a lower rotational speed. The specifications on their website don't even give an average latency time, so it's probably not a good selling point for them.
__________________
bit∙hub [bit-huhb] n. A source and destination for information.
bithub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 05:52 PM   #15
and the hat of sweating
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,425
Black has a 5 year warranty, Green is only 3 years.
__________________
"I am probably the laziest programmer on the planet, a fact with which anyone who has ever seen my code will agree." - esbo, 11/15/2008

"the internet is a scary place to be thats why i dont use it much." - billet, 03/17/2010
cpjust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difference Equations / Recurrence Relations DavidP General Discussions 4 10-05-2007 10:26 AM
Laptop HD Help ober Tech Board 9 08-04-2004 06:47 PM
Spontaneous Restarts, could be HD? CPU? or MB? Xei Tech Board 19 02-25-2003 10:53 PM
problem with maxtor 120 GB extern HD *ClownPimp* A Brief History of Cprogramming.com 3 07-09-2002 05:51 AM
Revive a HD? Dual-Catfish A Brief History of Cprogramming.com 5 05-13-2002 08:25 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22