LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksBecause the 9x kernel was obsolete. It was a weird hybrid of 16-bit and 32-bit technology, based on inadequate legacy code. It had fundamental restrictions that made it nearly impossible to support SMP or anything even resembling a security model.
Yes, sure.
I don't think so.
I don't know.
This is a discussion on Programming, design and concept within the Tech Board forums, part of the Community Boards category; Because the 9x kernel was obsolete. It was a weird hybrid of 16-bit and 32-bit technology, based on inadequate legacy ...
Because the 9x kernel was obsolete. It was a weird hybrid of 16-bit and 32-bit technology, based on inadequate legacy code. It had fundamental restrictions that made it nearly impossible to support SMP or anything even resembling a security model.
All the buzzt!
CornedBee
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
Because 9x was a piece of crap, and I have a cluster running NT 4.0 that hasnt needed a reset in over 2 years, and it only got it then because I needed to move it to my new apartment.Originally Posted by zacs7
NT wasnt a flop, it just wasnt marketed as a consumer level product.
Until you can build a working general purpose reprogrammable computer out of basic components from radio shack, you are not fit to call yourself a programmer in my presence. This is cwhizard, signing off.
