Fedora 9 - Instability

This is a discussion on Fedora 9 - Instability within the Tech Board forums, part of the Community Boards category; I can't seem to have this distro run on my machine for more than a few hours without my system ...

  1. #1
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,475

    Fedora 9 - Instability

    I can't seem to have this distro run on my machine for more than a few hours without my system hanging or the kernel crashing.

    The biggest culprit seems to be the PackageKit, which is indeed a nightmarish application. But the whole distro also seems to be built on strange grounds.

    For instance, upgrading to X.org 1.5 from the main repository invalidates the fedora boot screen (a quiet attractive one, at that). This is no big deal, the OS keeps booting in text mode and Gnome fires normally. However, this issue runs across all machines, regardless of setup, after the update. So why did someone have to fill a bug report for an issue that happens on any fedora machina and regarding a package on the main repository? Scary...

    I should stay away from this, shouldn't I?
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  2. #2
    Banned master5001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Visalia, CA, USA
    Posts
    3,685
    To be honest, I loved Red Hat in a way that can only be gauged similarly to the way a man loves a his wife, son, and dog combined. So switching over to fedora was kind of a drag to me. I use Ubuntu on my main desktop, and OpenSuSE on my main dev machine. To be honest, I will have to download Fedora 9 to see if I can duplicate your pain. So be patient and we shall see what happens.

  3. #3
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,475
    I'm honestly starting to think these packages are really just a waste of our time. The OS just doesn't suit well for pretty laced box distributions. Distributions like Arch Linux seem the way to go. Only if there were Linux books as it used to be in the days, where you could really learn how to use Linux and slowly but steadily build your way up a distro like Arch.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  4. #4
    &TH of undefined behavior Fordy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    5,789
    I try to keep my machines running on the debian package managed systems (Ubuntu, debian, knoppix) - never had a problem with it.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    287
    Your experience with Fedora was much better than mine luckily. Granted, I only have two machines at my disposal here, but the last time I tried Fedora (1.5 - 2 years ago I think), I installed directly off the DVD, ran a yum update overnight, and the next day the system wouldn't boot - kernel panic.

    After I reproduced this same thing 3 times in a row, I went to the message boards, listened to every single piece of advice that any expert could give, and the final conclusion was... just don't update. DON'T UPDATE!? Riiiight.

    My experience with Ubuntu was MUCH nicer, but I still prefer Windows for many reasons.

    [edit]
    I almost forgot to mention Gentoo. When I first decided to try Linux, most of my friends were telling me, "Oh god no, don't go with Gentoo, it's a nightmare." EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE. I love Gentoo. I've compiled a complete system from scratch on both of my machines and had almost zero problems. When you emerge a package, it just plain works. And the couple times it didn't, and I couldn't figure out why, I went to the message boards and immediately some very experienced members solved the problem. Sure the installs and updates take a while if you don't use binary packages, but I expected that.
    [/edit]
    Last edited by arpsmack; 09-30-2008 at 05:48 AM.

  6. #6
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Fordy View Post
    I try to keep my machines running on the debian package managed systems (Ubuntu, debian, knoppix) - never had a problem with it.
    I'm just annoyed at this, so I shoot in all directions. Nevermind me.
    A typical installation of fedora 9 with all updates takes around 8 hours on my machine. Even with just Gnome, that's around 700 Mbs post-intallation updates I have to download on my meager internet connection. And I ended up doing this twice.

    I'll either go CentOS or just forget about RedHat and move on to Ubuntu... the one everyone says it's easy but crashes on my machine during installation.

    Quote Originally Posted by arpsmack View Post
    My experience with Ubuntu was MUCH nicer, but I still prefer Windows for many reasons.
    Ah, well... I don't. Not anymore. I'm divorcing from Windows.
    In any case I want to learn about this operating system. It just seems the easier they tried to make it to use, the more difficult it became to learn from the viewpoint of a newcomer. I remember an argument I had with Elysia sometime ago... and I will have to concede to her on a few points. It's not the terminal window that scares me though. It's the whole thing that is stitched in so many complicated ways (I'm talking about GNOME and KDE) that it is definitely one of the most difficult tasks in computer usage these days to learn how to manage your desktop environment under Linux. The whole operating system is not welcoming to someone who actually wants to learn about it, instead of just use it.

    User-friendly? Maybe...
    Newcomer-friendly? Yes...
    Learning tool? Definitely no!
    Last edited by Mario F.; 09-30-2008 at 06:39 AM.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  7. #7
    Woof, woof! zacs7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,459
    Arch is fantastic, especially pacman (I wouldn't say I'm a Linux pro either). The strict Arch "conventions" means everything is *usually* where it should be.

    I've been using it for well over a year, just moved to 64-bit too without hassels . pacman (The package manager) is fantastic, the only problem is some dependencies aren't resolved... for example I upgraded Firefox (From pacman) which upgraded Gtk+ and friends -- but that broke Nautilus and friends

    I too tried Gentoo (for a few months infact), but really -- compiling *uhhh* boring . The only way you'll find a distro that works for you is try them, I started a few years back:
    FC3 -> RedHat -> FC5 -> Ubuntu 5.10 -> OpenSuse -> Gentoo -> Debian -> Arch [staying!]
    Last edited by zacs7; 09-30-2008 at 07:01 AM.

  8. #8
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,475
    Just to get my bearings here... for how long have you been dabbling with Linux, zacs?
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  9. #9
    Woof, woof! zacs7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,459
    Since 2004 or so.

  10. #10
    pronounced 'fib' FillYourBrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    2,297
    Fedora 9 worked pretty easily for me with one exception. The wireless driver crashed my system. I had to get a patch that fixed that problem and it was a pretty recent (2 or 3 months ago?) update that fixed it. Perhaps that's your problem? can you disable your wireless hardware?
    Last edited by FillYourBrain; 09-30-2008 at 08:41 AM.
    "You are stupid! You are stupid! Oh, and don't forget, you are STUPID!" - Dexter

  11. #11
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,475
    Not using wireless. So I can't say that is a problem for me.

    Fedora behaves much better when I don't do the following:

    - Use PackageKit for repeating install operations. In fact when I don't use PackageKit at all. And for that matter I'm learning about yum and rpm, which are indeed nicer. The PackageKit GUI is... strange. It borders the useless and is one stupid package; no information in files sizes except when looking at packages descriptions, too big icons and fonts taking a lot of screen real estate, the groups list on the left doesn't reflect the repositories true group lists, an incredibly lame search box that searches over the entire repository lists, and heaps of bugs from a progress window that grows off the screen(!) as you keep displaying it, to occasional system halts and a dependencies window that also gets off the screen if it is too big. For pete's sake!...

    - Disable, remove, prosecute, and burn at the stake SELinux.

    - Disable Bluetooth.

    I still however get the occasional kernel crash or system halt.
    Last edited by Mario F.; 09-30-2008 at 10:44 AM.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  12. #12
    pronounced 'fib' FillYourBrain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    2,297
    yeah, I use yum for package management and everything really does work great. I've been more than pleased with Fedora for a couple years now. PackageKit could be the whole issue.
    "You are stupid! You are stupid! Oh, and don't forget, you are STUPID!" - Dexter

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,183
    woot!

    Red Hat 9 -> Mandrake(Mandriva) -> FC 2 -> SuSE -> FC 3 -> debian -> gentoo -> debian -> ubuntu

    since ~2003

    back on topic...

    I have never tried Fedora past version 3 or 4... so I can't comment on that.

    I find Ubuntu very easy to work with, though. I guess it's because of the huge user base. You can usually just type the error messages you get into google and you will get detailed instructions and explainations specific to Ubuntu .

  14. #14
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,475
    Quote Originally Posted by cyberfish View Post
    I find Ubuntu very easy to work with, though. I guess it's because of the huge user base. You can usually just type the error messages you get into google and you will get detailed instructions and explainations specific to Ubuntu .
    Yeah. And it's sickening. Like going to www.gnome-look.org/ and putting up with comments like "Why didn't you make this theme for Ubuntu? It's the most used distro!"... what a waste of perfectly good brain cells. Somebody shoot the fads.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,183
    True, I guess the problem with Ubuntu is that it attracts newbies, since it advertises itself as the easiest to use. With newbies come with silly comments. If you really know Linux, it doesn't really matter what distro you use. It's the same Linux afterall. You can throw me pretty much any desktop distro (within reason, of course), and I will be able to use it after 1-2 hrs of reading about the package management system and such that are specific to the distro. I even ran Linux on my ipod.

    My point is, though, it probably doesn't make sense to use a startup distro with 10 users worldwide if one is just starting out on Linux.

    I still recommend Ubuntu (and I use it myself, too, because it is convenient). I use Debian on my server because it's more easily configurable, and Ubuntu on my desktop and tablet PC.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-13-2009, 12:57 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-02-2009, 11:34 AM
  3. Fedora Forum Corrupt?
    By CompanionCube in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-25-2009, 03:58 AM
  4. fedora 9.0
    By alyssa in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-02-2009, 09:58 AM
  5. Fedora Core3
    By Divorce3 in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-09-2005, 09:02 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21