I also have a few points to add in:
- Many of us for the most part dislike it not because we think it's slow or dislike the framework, but because of the pushy underhanded method by which it is...
Type: Posts; User: valis
I also have a few points to add in:
- Many of us for the most part dislike it not because we think it's slow or dislike the framework, but because of the pushy underhanded method by which it is...
I agree that this is the accepted definition of safe code, however, I definitely see a trend in the manipulation of its use, just like the issue C++ is in the name of the language (they are often...
I just looked over http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-372.htm and I agree the addition of some of the keywords is required simply because it's a concept which doesn't exist...
One major problem I have with it is that it's name has C++ in it. I'm no hardcore microsoft bashing linux fanboy, but it doesn't take a genius to notice the name is purposefully deceitful. I think...
I think that the fft case is actually a poor example, it's similar to the assembly C/C++/C#/etc. comparisons where the benchmarksman simply converts or hand compiles their stuff to assembly. Of...
I think these results may better display a languages ability.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
There's a reason you don't often (keyword to your left in this one for those waiting to attack)...
I don't recall being pressured to install wine when I installed linux, nor do I remember wine being considered revolutionary. I also don't remember wine competing with anyone or shielding its...
I'm just blowing smoke, but it seems like the syntactic differences offer little advantage over current C++ save it's not compatible with standard compilers. ref and value for example could have been...