The effects will have to go in the non-JS version, of course. That's what's known as progressive enhancement (or graceful degradation, depending on the side you're coming from).
Type: Posts; User: CornedBee
The effects will have to go in the non-JS version, of course. That's what's known as progressive enhancement (or graceful degradation, depending on the side you're coming from).
No. You just don't build URLs dynamically without a server submission alternative.
Because it's useful.
You'd be surprised to know all the things the web wasn't designed for. But if the principle holds true, then we shouldn't have any JavaScript, any styling options, or any...
Several corporate standards require disabling JavaScript on all browsers. This practice may get less common with Ajax being so popular, but I don't see it going away.
Also, many mobile devices...
CSS is actually quite rigid. But the most basic properties of the web, namely the diversity of devices (and thus sizes) make it impossible to go beyond a certain level of specification.
Screen...
It would be a heuristic decision that could fail and thus swallow proper tabular data. But you have a point. It should be possible to develop a pretty good heuristic.
Unfortunately, screen readers...