Search:

No, it supports quirky HTML syntax, even in standards mode, and interprets the XHTML as such. As such, there isn't really any value to using XHTML over well-formed, clean HTML 4.

IE does not...

The failure of XHTML 1.0 (and yes, I do consider it a failure) is MS's fault, for not supporting it. Pretty much the same for XHTML 1.1.

The failure of XHTML 2.0 is the W3C's fault. First, they...

Just went and confirmed that Fox3 passes. Your source has a buggy nightly, weird settings, or an extension that messes things up.

The standards have grown historically. HTML 4.01 was the last HTML...

HTML 5 and its XHTML serialization will probably displace XHTML 1.1 and XHTML 2.0 pretty much completely.

Huh? My Firefox 3 nightlies pass Acid2. Not booted into the experimental system, so no screenshots now, but I specifically checked this.

It also doesn't exist. All XHTML 1.1 is strict. The three variants exist only for 1.0.

CSS3 isn't even finished, so don't blame any browser for not supporting it fully.

For everyone except them.

We can describe the algorithms in English, but there currently is no computer that will successfully execute them, so the problem cannot actually be solved.

I think the best definition for "programming language" is "a language that can be used to solve computational problems". This includes all the declarative languages like Scheme, Haskell, Prolog,...

I learned first Lingo and later C++, Java and C# all by myself. I later got education in computer science, which undoubtedly has helped me a lot in programming, but the languages are self-taught.