Oh I see, that makes sense now. So the reason this is hard to do with a single pipe is that as soon as you reuse that pipe for a second command, it's going to start writing data into the same pipe...
Type: Posts; User: sean
Oh I see, that makes sense now. So the reason this is hard to do with a single pipe is that as soon as you reuse that pipe for a second command, it's going to start writing data into the same pipe...
Not sure I follow your current approach, entirely, but... if your pipeline consists of n commands, you need n - 1 pipes, and you probably want to assign them iteratively rather than recursively. I...