>> You can now proceed to http://gnu.org/even_more to receive your free, signed "RMS" beer stein -- made of solid 'pewter!
You mean free...as in beer? :D
>> Now see, those types of warning...
Type: Posts; User: Sebastiani
>> You can now proceed to http://gnu.org/even_more to receive your free, signed "RMS" beer stein -- made of solid 'pewter!
You mean free...as in beer? :D
>> Now see, those types of warning...
>> Why shouldn't it "know" if you use sprintf instead of sprintf_s? That makes no sense. I can understand if you are annoyed by the warning, but you can disable them.
Who wants their compiler...
>> cl.exe is just an executable name. Could be rocksolid.exe and should still say the truth. Meanwhile Visual C++ is the generic name given to the C/C++ component of the Visual Studio, including the...
>> Yes, the executable name is cl.exe. But the compiler's actual name is Visual C++ or Visual C.
No, the name of the *package* is Visual C++. The name of the compiler is cl. Just ask the command...
>> Visual C++ (and Visual C?) is the compiler(s).
The actual compiler as invoked from the command line is cl (last time I used it anyway).
>> Before MSVS, I was using borland.
I used Borland compilers for many years, and can honestly say they are my favorite to work with. Probably the "fastest" compiler ever built, too.
I generally use gcc. From the command line (hate IDE's).