Search:

I am working on a client server based communication protocol stack.
I have a list of errors that could occur during the course of communication
Like,



Errortype [1]
Type1 ...

Can i have something like a reference to pointer that can change the pointer but not the value in the pointed location.


void fail(const char *& i)
{
i++;
}


int main()

I have to encode the parameters present inside a structure based on X.690 encoding.
Suppose, my structure is:

struct Data_Struct
{
parameter1
parameter2
parameter3
...

But there is partial specialization as well, right? Like:

template<class T> void func(complex<T>)

Thanks for pointing out my mistake.. I thought it was specialization of the template to work on pointers..

Sorry for asking such adumb question. I got the answer. It seems to specialize the template. Don't know how to delete a thread. Sorry about that..

Is the template :
template<class T> void function1(T* t); a specialization of the template:
template<class T> void function1(T t); ?. Do I have to specialize it for void* and derive from it?

Hi,
Few mistakes I found in your code were:
1. You haven't closed your destructor correctly. You have just closed the while loop but not the destructor.
2. While pushing, Shouldn't it be
...

Thanks.. And Sorry.. For asking such a stupid question.. What i wanted in my project was to change the address pointed to by the pointer.. I could have just returned a reference to the pointer, like...

int * p=new int();
int* function ()
{
*p=10;
cout<<"old p :"<<*p<<endl;
return p;
}
int main()
{
int c=25;

Thank you..
I ran the code in code block. It worked.

Thanks for the reply..



Is this how the above step is to be done:


void f() //Unexpected exception handler
{
cout<<"Unexpected handler"<<endl;

I know that having global variables is not appreciated. But in the book, The C++ programming language, by Bjarne Stroustrup, Author says that " The only way to gain control in case of throw from an...