i think we're on different wavelengths here. Im refering to the [natural] creation of a black hole from a star, a star has to exceed a certain mass to be a candidate for a black hole.
Type: Posts; User: Perspective
i think we're on different wavelengths here. Im refering to the [natural] creation of a black hole from a star, a star has to exceed a certain mass to be a candidate for a black hole.
>>The existance [of black holes] doesn't depend on mass
agreed, but the creation does.
well, considering a black hole is a star that becomes so massive it collapses on itself, id say this isnt feasable. Not just the replacement but the existance of the entity itself. Now, if our sun...
it becomes a meteroriteor. then if it comes back to earth its a meteoriteorite, and so on... :p
oh, oh. this one im sure about ;)
>>It also picks up a small amount of material from falling rocks (meteorites).
This is incorrect. A meteroite is a meteor (or piece of meteor) that resides on...
>In other news, thirty seconds with Google trumps a year of education. :p
hey, i said i was in the classes, i didnt say anything about being awake... :p
edit: but i actually hadnt heard that...
>at one point it was hit by one so large that it broke off a very large chunk: the moon.
i took a full year of astronomy courses and ive never even heard that mentioned as a theory. I was told...
Increased. If you want to know why, explanations start a $5 a piece :p