>>We're not going to get anywhere in this Vick thing, guys. Let's agree to disagree and make fun of TO, ok?<<
Agreed. It was fun while it lasted, well fought mate ;)
LOL those posts are...
Type: Posts; User: PJYelton
>>We're not going to get anywhere in this Vick thing, guys. Let's agree to disagree and make fun of TO, ok?<<
Agreed. It was fun while it lasted, well fought mate ;)
LOL those posts are...
>>It's not just , but typically if the TE gets the most looks it means the QB isn't trying to go downfield as much as he should be. It doesn't make any sense that Crumpler can get more separation...
I mostly agree with you, just not the fact that Crumpler being the number one receiver is Vick's fault. Also, I think the big difference here is if anything I've heard the exact opposite about what...
True. Without that defense they are probably a 8-8 team with Vick and 5-11 without him.
I agree with Kermi, he certainly needs to improve his throwing and get better receivers before he can ever become a great QB. That being said though, I think he unjustly gets blamed for the fact...
Well to be fair, the guy has NO receivers to throw to besides Crumpler. Price is their best wideout, and he'd be the third or fourth best receiver on most other teams if that, so rarely is looking...
I think they give him so much credit because he is one of the few guys who can singlehandedly make a couple of crazy plays to win the game for his team. BUT he is also one of a few guys who single...
Woah, they pulled it out. Great, now it looks like we have a year to look forward to nothing but this:
RoD: You owe me money!
BobDole: No I don't now we're even!
Rod: Yes you do!
BobDole: No I...
LOL, Atlanta scores, here comes the choke! :D