I think you should use threads. One thread that includes a while loop...
while (flag == 0) {
// do movement stuff...
}
Type: Posts; User: 68656c70
I think you should use threads. One thread that includes a while loop...
while (flag == 0) {
// do movement stuff...
}
Add 1 to your pointer, or subtract 1.
Okay okay
void append(struct node *q, int num)
{
struct node *temp;
printf("\n in append");
temp = (struct node *)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
temp->data = num;
@C_Enthusiast: At least you can draw something...
char *m[] = {"data\0", "come\0", "here\0"};
for (p=0; p<3; p++) printf("%s\n", m[p]);
Could be void... it isn't that significant at this point. I concentrated on logical errors rather than syntactical errors. Gcc didn't throw any errors/warnings though.
Maybe this will help you:
append(struct node *q, int num)
{
struct node *temp;
printf("\n in append");
temp = (struct node *)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
temp->data =...
I program in C when speed and efficiency are primary goals. :)
I was talking to C_Enthusiast... :)
A graphic representation would really help...
Can you ping both networks from the same device at the same time? That would be odd.
Style 2 all the way! Easier to read imo...
If you sort your input, you have a linked list.
I hope it's bug-free... and correct.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct tree_node {
int data;
struct tree_node *parent;
Try this (includes a minor optimization in execution speed):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
int i;
int count = 0;
struct tree_node {
char data[80];
struct tree_node *parent;
struct tree_node *left_child;
struct tree_node *right_child;
};
All else depends on traversal type:
Thank you all for your help!
Changed: strncpy(str, (enc + 2), (strlen(enc) - 2));
To: strcpy(str, (enc + 2));
...now works as desired.
P.S.: Couldn't imagine strncpy would cause such a...
strlen(enc) wouldn't work either...
NULL byte was added on purpose at the end of those string literals.
Indeed replacing (strlen(enc) - 2) and strlen(str) with 128 DOES solve the problem!
...
Am I the only one having this problem?
Please try to compile and run using:
rotated[32] = 0x01;
for example.
I can't understand how can stack smashing detection get triggered by that byte of...
$uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.28-18-generic #60-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 04:40:52 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
$$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3
Feel free to experiment with the...