It compiles the way it is, with the "%".
I can't seem to locate the function, but I know it is from a separate input file. It seems as though I need direct access to the stack and to the...
Type: Posts; User: TheEngineer
It compiles the way it is, with the "%".
I can't seem to locate the function, but I know it is from a separate input file. It seems as though I need direct access to the stack and to the...
That is the m68k version with all the other crap deleted. It seems to cross-compile correctly. What I am trying to get around is rewriting it for the x86 by writing it in C.
Really, all this XPrc...
Sorry, I didn't explain that well. MULTI uses some different instructions for its assembly files that aren't used in regular m68k assembly.
Converting to C sounds like it would relieve a lot of...
The assembly file was written with Green Hills MULTI, and isn't compatible with either the m68k or the x86 through GNU. That is to say it was written for the m68k but has program-specific functions...
I have a C file and an assembly file for a program that I need to compile for both the x86 and m68k processors. Instead of making 2 versions of the assembly file, will it work if I write it inline in...