That's the problem, I did not say that nor did I mean that. I said that in practice the validity of a patent is tested in a court, not when the patent is granted, that would obviously be a problem...
Type: Posts; User: Subsonics
That's the problem, I did not say that nor did I mean that. I said that in practice the validity of a patent is tested in a court, not when the patent is granted, that would obviously be a problem...
Your response to this:
Was this:
My post had a much larger scope than apple vs samsung, it wasn't about that at all, it was not a defence of what it described. Just a short statement of...
Well, if by "this topic" you mean software patents in general then you are wrong. I thought it was meant to serve as an example of a weak patent. And how did you derive that I support this practise...
I see what you are saying, but I'm not interested in discussing any particular case. But if I must, for example if SlyMaelstrom bring it up out of the blue. I will speak my opinion about it. These...
Have I said anything that indicates that it is fair? I made cold, cynical remark on the way it currently works. Apparently you took that as some kind of implicit defense of the patent system on my...
Not necessarily, do you agree that the validity of a patent is not guaranteed when it's granted, but in practice, if it's ever challenged by a court?
I don't know why you went from the...
Most megacorporations have large patent portfolios only to be able to counter sue, and come to a cross license agreement if they are sued themselves. It's a cost of doing business basically. In...