Search:

wow, that's a clever implementation. Thank you. But it's too complicated for a simple implementation that I'm looking for. I will just skip C arrays since I will probably never use them directly...

Thanks for the clarifications, especially on C++ array definition. These functions are used by a Debug class to dump random user data into a file stream.

This sounds like a dead end. I'm trying to plug this debug class in a old code set. Most part of the code has already used a stripped-down version of the vector class, but some older parts still...

By the way, is there a better way to handle the variable arguments function reloading than the pyramid I used? I don't want to go with the old C va_list method.

Well, these "arrays" are dynamically allocated with "new double[]". their sizes are not going to change once allocated. Maybe I should go with a non-uniform argument list, say, move the "int...

Sorry about the confusion. I don't process any single pointers, only need to overload it to work with arrays. I haven't thought about a class implementation, but these functions are already class...

Thanks. Multiple instantiation is not an issue, since these are all two-statement inline functions. However, the problem is that I don't know the array size ahead of time. If I change your...

I need to overload a function template so that it can handle between 1 to 6 arbitrary arguments. So I have these declarations:

template<typename T>
void f(int verbose, const T&);
...