It is working fine with the solution you suggested.
Thanks a bunch
Can you please explain me why it wasn't k earlier...coz the pointer also would give the same size of the node. It was working...
Type: Posts; User: fancy217
It is working fine with the solution you suggested.
Thanks a bunch
Can you please explain me why it wasn't k earlier...coz the pointer also would give the same size of the node. It was working...
I hv gone through a code a couple of times now but cannot come up with the flaw.
I have faced this before which means I am going wrong somewhere.....
Please give a look at the code.....
I was trying to make a simple binary tree
When i ran it, turbo C terminated
while it wrkd fine when i compiled using gcc
I used a count variable to keep a check in the loop....and the value of...