Search:

Yeah I actually have no idea why I'd need to know. I spent a good couple minutes thinking about it, and I've got nothin'.

I don't see how this relates to my argument at all, but I'm not shocked in the least that someone disagrees with me.

It's not like I feel very strongly about this. It just bothers me a little...

IMO, this is one of the downsides of how you access static methods in most object oriented languages. This code would work as well:

((A*) 5003)->print();

It doesn't matter what you put in...