Yes we can. I do agree with you on that one.
Type: Posts; User: Elysia
Yes we can. I do agree with you on that one.
But that is mostly apache, and there are many flavors of servers and there are exploits created specifically for servers and yada yada yada, all those details...
But anyway, I'm not asking you to...
Yes, the problem is that they receive far less security vulnerabilities to take care off. That's the point.
So less vulnerabilities found = less bugs/security problems fixed.
The idea under Vista is that applications should ask for administrator privileges when they need 'em and not otherwise. In other words, you should be able to run apps as non-admin and they should...
I would also like to add that even if reviewing the code (and how do you do that anyway with so much code?), you don't realize something is broken until it breaks. Do you know how much time is spent...
Oh, if it increases security, you bet EU will be breathing down their necks and security companies screaming foul and Microsoft would find themselves in many more lawsuits than already.
Indeed,...
I think you misunderstand.
Linux is probably more insecure than Vista.
"What!?" you say.
Windows has long been exposed to all kinds of attacks and therefore has always needed better security....
Well, no, not all... Anti-virus software stop spread of malicious software, for one. That has nothing to do with the operating system.
Many security companies add extra security to Windows, not fix...
That depends on what it does. Many AV & security software solutions use this method to protect the system.
No, it's not a normal way and it's bound to break with new versions of Windows. Many...