Search:

I find the point moot. Since ++n and n++ does different things, there are times when you will avoid from using the same syntax. It's also a matter of opinion, because a few...

I can wait forever. It seems others are impatient.
I just want to know it the current draft will do. If the current draft is good enough to be considered as to be able to replace the current main...

Anyway, what's the say on the draft? Can we put this issue to rest or is it too early?

I've gone over the main article and my draft.
I made a few minor changes to the main article. A small edit to be more gender neutral and I also commented out the part that actually encouraged the...

Thank you, at least, for making an effort with this.
I'll tell you what I'll do. I'll have a look over the main article again and compare it to the draft and try to re-evaluate the draft and see how...

NO! I want people who object to take a look, see what's missing and point out what can be changed, with examples if possible. That way you get your point across.


That's very nice of you.
You're...

And clearly it's no use trying to state it explicitly anyway because it's either ignored or misinterpreted.

Clearly people do no understand what I'm implying.
And clearly it's impossible to reason with you people.
All I want is suggestions to my draft to make it acceptable and approved by the community....

I have already stated that I'm fine with people editing the draft I have. What I don't like is major overhauls, which is why I ask before I replace.

It makes it much easier to make sure I address every point. It's either that or try to remember everything and address all which usually just falls apart since I miss something. I prefer the former,...

Yes, and I've had like 3-4 hours at most at home and most if it I've spent looking around the forum.


I don't, whatever you may think.


And as I've already stated, the community article is...

It is. But the main point was that if it explains something or helps in any way, then I'm for it.
Of course anyone may edit it, but I don't think it will be like last time. No major overhauls...

Because there are two indentation articles on the wiki and everyone agrees they must be merged. But they cannot be merged just yet, which is why we have the problem.



Futile indeed? Well, call...

Might just do that. Thanks for the heads up!
Will add to a TODO.

OK, so let's try to fix this thing so we can actually merge the two articles.
First, I'll list Mario's suggestion's first, as best I can:

Suggestion #1


Suggestion #2


Suggestion #3