Search:

I only know of Apache (typical Linux) and Windows Server. They seem to be the most popular if I'm not mistaken.

I never change, do I? ;-)
Until I find a better language, I'm going to continue to try creating my own "special" language.


Oh yes, I'm fully aware. I remember how many times they've gotten me...

Yes, I do know what CGI (typically Perl) and PHP are.
I've used PHP + mysql myself.
Well yes, to be honest, I'd rather use C++ for server-side applications rather than PHP or Perl, if I could make...

The biggest complaint seem to be around that opinions are evil or the real world doesn't care about them.
Yes, I know, in the real world, you just have to bite it and do it.
I'm fully aware of this...

Well, I might think that the following might not work:
MyManagedObj* pObj; // Assume it points to something
BYTE* pRaw = (BYTE*)pObj;
Now do whatever you want with pRaw. Dump it to a file for all...

I'd rather think of it as "slow down."
I fail to believe dynamic recompilation can beat native.

It's a trade-off. It's good, but it removes too much flexibility.


I meant compiled on-the-fly. Like a dynamic recompiler or stuff.


Say what you want, but I don't like it and though it's not...

The problem is that I mentioned above.
I don't like managed.
I don't like VM.
I don't like Interpreted, compiled or whatever.
I don't like slow startups.
I don't like being restricted to what I...

I think we need to think outside the box of efficiency for a while.
C++ programmers seem to be obsessed with it.
Such a solution may be a little tricky but would give much better syntactic sugar in...

I'll give them thumbs up for that, at least.

I simply redesigned the EXISTING template which was not mine to begin with.
And believe it or not, there's a huge amount of just set/get out there and we DO want to hide them.
And it does get rid...

No, it isn't.
Instead of passing the address via the constructor, you merely pass it when defining the object within the class definition.

Instead of:
property<int> myproperty;
myproperty(this,...

This can be changed. Let me demonstrate.


template<typename T, typename Class, void (Class::* setter_)(const T&), const T& (Class::*getter_)() const>
class property
{
typedef property...

I have a problem with it mostly due to two [four] reasons:
1) Having to write two functions to do thing (basically).
2) Having two functions littering the definition instead of one.
And the...

The function pointer can be passed via the template declaration instead to save some bytes...
4 bytes overhead is not much. It's typically what a smart pointer takes (or less).
I find it acceptable...

Ah yes, I was never suggesting letting users access data directly. No no no.
It's possible to "emulate" properties using some operators and templates. They act just like data members from the...

Get/set for everything is horrible X_X
Having them as properties is more invigorating.

Very nice to see something like this.
I would be interested in making changes more to VB-like style (ie form.Caption = "something") instead of a function and such.
Also more of a suggestion - but...