Or, the function might be the member of an object which tracks the state of the outer loop - in which case you only need to return.
Type: Posts; User: JVene
Or, the function might be the member of an object which tracks the state of the outer loop - in which case you only need to return.
You've got the first answer, break and the concept of break only works on the containing level (nothing propagates outward to containing loops).
I'd like to address the design and thought process...