Search:

It was sang-drax.

I think that post proves it depends on the person.

> You might be surprised that I don't agree with the religious zealouts of the current day regarding this debate.

C'mon, Bubba. Give me a little more credit than that. I'd be pretty surprised if...

> then why don't you debate whether or not evolution (or god's existence, or whatever) has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Evolution has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Jesus, do...

> Since the whole man/ape thing is only a theory anyways and not proven science

Gravity is "only a theory". The idea that germs cause infections is "only a theory". "It's only a theory" is a...

> A why would be the basis for any ethics we hold to. Without purpose there is no identity or ethics.

Why should there be a reason for science to create a system of ethics? Science explains the...

Why do you feel there needs to be a why? I've never seen a scientist striving to find empirical evidence that states humanity has some sort of higher purpose. We just are.

>>how about you back that statement up with some examples?

>In addition, we all know that the Bible can not necessarily be taken literally. You have to read parts as poetry, symbology, parables,...

> but eventually simply breaks down.

That's the nice thing about science. It adapts when things are shown to be wrong, and showing that things are wrong is very much promoted. When something in...