It is pretty much an error under CSE HTML Validator. The reason why you get a warning is because the specification uses 'should' and 'should not' (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt) when addressing...
Type: Posts; User: Mario F.
It is pretty much an error under CSE HTML Validator. The reason why you get a warning is because the specification uses 'should' and 'should not' (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt) when addressing...
Max, you are mixing 1.1 with 1.0. It's 1.0 that is being widely used.
1.1 cannot be served as HTML. It must be served as xml. That's the whole purpose of 1.1. 1.0 (while the 0 in there may...
I can see I have a lot of catching-up to do. Been away for too long.
Wait, IE7 supports XHTML 1.0 served as HTML. It offers Quirks mode for backward compatibility with IE6 which is ran by default (I think), and Standard mode that is triggered on the presence of a xml...
Well, I actually have no idea why. XHTML 1.1 and 2 make sense. These force development teams to scrap years of development on their rendering engines. No browser support or little browser support...
That reminds me...
You'd think there ought to be less entropy in W3C published drafts. HTML 5 completely confuses me, CornedBee. Do you think that it has contributed the the general lack of...
Hmm... I don't have it on my system. My source was wrong then or maybe he tested it with some nightly build which didn't. Thanks for the correction.
As for XHTML 1.1 suppport, I'm not entirely sure how it is going. I think that all browsers without exception range is very-poor-to-no support. Let us not forget that 1.1 is not intended to be served...
It's supposed to level out with Opera and Firefox support of XHTML 1.0, but not 1.1.
Note that despite the criticism IE7 was a giant leap towards standards conformance. Still not entirely...
That is indeed the general argument I also hear in favor of WYSIWYGs editors. Curiously though, I hear that argument only from those in favor of these tools. What I never saw was a study that...
They sure do. Very well observed.
I make a point of remembering it when coding for institutional content where text is usually long. When text is somewhat short and more informative than anything...
Not even near what I would like it to be. But thanks.
It still has a few code issues I would like to handle. MZProperty for instance needs to be moved to XHTML and the CSS is patchy at a few points....
But that is exactly the problem, don't you see?
DIVs have no semantical value. They are intended to provide structure to the content and as an helper for CSS ability to give rendering instructions...
Mike, the problem is that WYSIWYG editors can't generate proper HTML/CSS because they can't infer into the value of the semantics we intend for our content. So the results are sometimes remarkable.
...
I would say HTML WYSIWYG editors are the main responsible for the general feeling W3C has been talking to brick walls all this time.
It you want standards compliance and accessibility in one go,...
We can probably agree a complete, bounded, definition is not possible. I agree with your description. But it still leaves room for debate.
I've been faced with computational problems when writing...
With due respect to those people that is crap. A programming language needs to be defined with much more than just that. I'm surprised at how that "urban myth" has survived this long.
That just...
I agree HTML shouldn't probably be considered a programming language. It's a container-based markup language. A programming language in the traditional sense, would force HTML to be able to alter the...
I'm pleased to see this one evidence Universities still forge careers.
I'm completely self-taught. In computer programming languages, that is.