From MSDN:As a result, allowing a thread to close its own handle may not necessarily remove the thread from the system since the thread has not terminated.
Type: Posts; User: johnnie2
From MSDN:As a result, allowing a thread to close its own handle may not necessarily remove the thread from the system since the thread has not terminated.
You could use a combination of ListView_GetItem() and ListView_SetItem(). The iItem member of the LVITEM structure refers to the index of the item within the list view.
With this in mind, you'd...
You may be interested in MSDN's edit control section.
Look into GetModuleFileName().
Interestingly, the scenario you've suggested is very unlikely to occur. Windows's multithreading capabilities are based upon a system of thread priorities. Threads of relatively high priorities...
You could change the method by which the threads enter the critical section (using TryEnterCriticalSection() rather than EnterCriticalSection()), but that may not be the best solution.
Instead,...
You may want to see Is Winsock thread-safe? from the Winsock Programmer's FAQ for an answer to your original question.
You may want to see Johnnie's Winsock Tutorial.
Have you ensured that all machines, including the two new machines, are members of the same workgroup?
You may be interested in Johnnie's Winsock Tutorial.
I'd like to suggest:
Johnnie's Winsock Tutorial
for inclusion into the list.
Invoking closesocket() on a particular socket cancels any active connection and causes the operating system to discard internally-managed data regarding the socket. After the call, the unfortunate...
Please carefully review all posts within this thread. You'll see that the original poster desires a device to edit the registry of a remote computer system. Anon suggested using the remote editing...
The original poster wishes to edit the registry of a remote computer system. The poster asked for tips regarding the creation of such a device. Anon suggested that the original poster simply use...
The upper limit is determined by the operating system, and is indeed a power of two. If the application does not manually set the upper limit, the edit control is constrained to 32,767 bytes by...
Yes.
Not necessarily. The server is not guaranteed to receive the entire string in one call to recv(); it may take up to five server-side invocations (not including the NULL terminator) to secure...
Are you utilizing asynchronous sockets with window notifications?
The major difference I see between the two code listings is that the TempDirectoryPath string is effectively allocated on the heap in the working sample (declared static), while in the failed code...
Alright, are you saying any command after PASV is simply not sent (any further command sent to the server has no effect or the send() results in an error) or that nothing is happening after...
Something along the lines of SetWindowLong() with the GWL_WNDPROC flag. Pass in a function pointer to your new procedure to redirect the control's messages.
Johnnie's Winsock Tutorial and The Winsock Programmer's FAQ are two more resources geared towards Winsock.
btw, that's an excellent sig minesweeper.
Right. You'll have to specify the browser executable (iexplore.exe for Internet Explorer) and the path to your HTML document as the parameter field. The operation to perform should remain "open,"...
Post code; bind()ing a UDP socket really shouldn't spawn a listening socket running a totally different protocol.
Or the wrap program stalls and never returns control to the caller.
Technically, you're not getting a handle to the other process's message loop directly; you're retrieving a handle to the process's window and using that in conjunction with SendMessage() or...