Search:

Yes, they really spend time to help me recently.

I am fully agree with two last posts of valis and Mario F.

In the time that MS writes its OS in .net or CL. .net is the best thing(?) in the world.

I mean in what language managed assemblies are written.

Now who is agree with me?

-> .net is a good thing.
-> C++ good code will be faster than C++/CLI good code.
-> MS is making all the things terrible.

>>-Some feel that its too slow, although benchmarks clearly disprove that issue.

It makes me laugh. In what language .net framework is written?

God bless Microsoft for giving us this opportunity.

Though Micorosoft sites only mention .net for Windows API, I found out (Told in MS forum) that Vista core is on base of core code of Windows Server 2003. So we can use its unmanaged functions.

>>somebody's going to have to prove this "its slow" thing. As I understand it, the MSIL is compiled down to machine code at first run. Which should be damn near the same runtime speed.
In first...

.net is not magic, you can include these security enhencements in your unmanaged code maybe better than MS.

Yes, these are the points. But you cannot ignore them as you did.
Using UNSAFE because its short? Every word has a meaning. Psychology, yes I think MS has a team of psychologists. Even us (ppl in...

Yes it seems that windows API is going to be .net
.net3 (WinFX) for Vista.

.net code should be in MSIL (CLI) to be portable.

Really? Intresting!
I compiled your code:
non clr =5.5k
clr =24.5k

Both were optimized.

OS API has nothing to do with .Net. As far as I know .net uses windows API for Windows apps. Correct...

No, with /clr swith cl.exe will be a completely different compiler.
For example my 20KBs program will be 80KBs with /clr switch.
With clr, C++ is not itself.

There should be a board for C++/CLI. Then I will come there and open a ton of threads about it. C++/CLI is more related to C than C#.
CLI is not faster or safer, it is just easier for usual tasks....