Search:

Type: Posts; User: grumpy

Search: Search took 0.05 seconds.

  1. Thread: C++ vs C

    by grumpy
    Replies
    79
    Views
    8,608

    Well, the interpretation in the documentation for...

    Well, the interpretation in the documentation for that particular product characterised it in the way I described.

    Depending on how you tie down the definition of a compiler, a linker is just a...
  2. Thread: C++ vs C

    by grumpy
    Replies
    79
    Views
    8,608

    One of the proprietary (and paid-for in...

    One of the proprietary (and paid-for in significant dollars) C++ compilers/linkers on Silicon Graphics (I can't remember the product name or version number offhand) in the mid 1990s handled templates...
  3. Thread: C++ vs C

    by grumpy
    Replies
    79
    Views
    8,608

    It's not so much C++ architectures, as it is...

    It's not so much C++ architectures, as it is particular architectures that are easy to overuse in C++ and difficult in C (or vice versa). An example would be excessive use of inheritance, which...
  4. Thread: C++ vs C

    by grumpy
    Replies
    79
    Views
    8,608

    I'm personally more interested in what will...

    I'm personally more interested in what will happen to the site when Salem posts his 32767th and 32768th posts ;)
  5. Thread: C++ vs C

    by grumpy
    Replies
    79
    Views
    8,608

    Well, you didn't make that clear. The words...

    Well, you didn't make that clear. The words "do" and "achieve" are pretty closely related, and you did not post anything referring to feature sets.
  6. Thread: C++ vs C

    by grumpy
    Replies
    79
    Views
    8,608

    Neither of your statements here is true. There...

    Neither of your statements here is true. There is nothing that can be achieved in C that can't be achieved in C++, or vice versa.

    What is true is that some things may be achieved more easily in...
Results 1 to 6 of 6