Search:

>> they are intentionally misinterpreting things to get more attention (and bend the facts)
Do you have evidence to back up this claim? It would seem that they do just the opposite. Perhaps you're...

>> This one. Wasn't I obvious enough?
Are you claiming that the email never existed? Or are you claiming that nobody ever wondered whether those images were real or not?

>> If you want to debunk...

>> What's the source of the email?
It's an email forward, who knows what the source is. That's irrelevant to the point of the page.

>> Was it spam mail?
Most likely yes. If not it would have...

>> What's weeding out false rumors with quotes such as "Why would anyone think we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Moslems!?" <<

I think you're just confused. Do you realize that...

>> Yes, precisely what the author of said article meant.
That's accuracy for you. <<

I don't understand this post. It seems like sarcasm, but I don't get it. Could you clarify what you're trying...

BTW, the snopes article linked to by Yarin was accurate (or certainly appears so). It was Yarin's interpretation and comprehension that was lacking.

>> everyone was siting snopes as their reliable source of information. Which seems outlandish to me. <<

Note that in this instance, it shouldn't be outlandish that Yarin did considering the rest...

If you like snopes, see the last part of this page:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/ownwords.asp