Arrrays, Loops, and Randomization

I have an int arrary of 10 -

int array[10]

by using #include <time.h> to be able to srnd using time for true varience like:

srand( (unsigned)time( NULL ) );
j = (int) 10 * rand() / (RAND_MAX + 1.0);

I want to be able to somehow create a loop (probably by using another array as well) that will put the numbers 1-10 in the array indices but in a way that all the numbers 1-10 are used and none are repeated.

I don't know if I am even on the right track of how I am going about this.. but I was thinking using another array filled with the numbers 1-10 and then somehow when I get j turn j's indice into a 0 and then my check for continuing the loop would be if all the indces of array2 are used and to only use the indice of array[j] if it is not 0.

so check for the loop would be something like...

for (i = 10, c = 0; i < 10 ; i++)
{
c = c + array[i];
}

if (c == 0)

/* stop loop */

else
/* loop continues */

and then in a nested loop maybe? something like..

{
srand( (unsigned)time( NULL ) );
j = (int) 10 * rand() / (RAND_MAX + 1.0)
if (array2[j] == 0);

else
{
array2[j] = 0;
array1[i] = j;
i++;
}
}

Any suggestions? thoughts? comments? How do I do this?

>Any suggestions? thoughts? comments? How do I do this?
Not a bad problem, here's one way:

Code:

---

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>

#define LOW  1
#define HIGH  10
#define SIZE  10
#define NPOS  SIZE
#define INVAL -1

static int find(int* array, int size, int val)
{
    int i;

    for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
    {
        if (array[i] == val)
            return i;
    }

    return size;
}

int main(void)
{
    int array[SIZE];
    int i = 0;
    int r;

    srand((unsigned)time(0));

    for (i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
        array[i] = INVAL;

    while ((i = find(array, SIZE, INVAL)) != NPOS)
    {
        r = (int)((double)rand() * HIGH) / RAND_MAX + LOW;

        if (find(array, SIZE, r) == NPOS)
            array[i] = r;
    }

    for (i = 0; i < SIZE; i++)
        printf("%d, ", array[i]);

    return 0;
}

---

Thank you for the help!!

is the plural of index really indices i thougth it was indexes

see http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/indices

Both 'indexes' and 'indices' are valid plurals of index except:

Quote:

---

6. (Math.) The figure or letter which shows the power or root
of a quantity; the exponent. [In this sense the plural is
always {indices}.]

---