Compiler goes into another level? :P

So, one guy from my uni posted this on his facebook,
Attachment 13157
He passed an int, without checking it and it was an int coming from an wrong computation. Compiler really didn't like it.

Had you ever got any "interesting-funny" compiler messages? :)

I haven't encountered any personally. But it would probably brighten my day if I saw one like that myself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Matticus

I haven't encountered any personally. But it would probably brighten my day if I saw one like that myself.

---

For sure, it would make me smile too. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by std10093

So, one guy from my uni posted this on his facebook,
Attachment 13157
He passed an int, without checking it and it was an int coming from an wrong computation. Compiler really didn't like it.

Had you ever got any "interesting-funny" compiler messages? :)

---

*That* isn't a compiler error message.

Post made with -pedantic option at 0200 hours

I wish gcc had a sense of humor...

And I also wish g++ had smaller error messages but alas, I am probably just bad at C++ XD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stevesmithx

*That* isn't a compiler error message.

Post made with -pedantic option at 0200 hours

---

Right. Rather, it's the message returned from the NSInvalidArgumentException object.

I checked back his post and he says "message from Xcode debugger". Should we "accept" it? :p