![]() |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 351
| Mixing gcc 2.9* with gcc 3.* OK, redhat 7.2 and 7.3 are distributed with gcc 2.9*. redhat 8.0 is distributed with gcc 3.2. Now from my experience, and research, you cannot mix libraries that are compiled with 2.9* with libraries that are compiled with 3.2* (because of differing paths and symbols); particularly c++ libraries. Is this true? Is there any way that you can link with 2.9* libraries whilst using gcc 3.2? Is it undesirable to mix? TIA, rotis23 |
| rotis23 is offline | |
| | #2 |
| Comment your source code! Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 533
| this may or may not help... From what I have read it doesn't really solve it, but it does shed some light on the subject and one post got a program to work... http://www.faqchest.com/prgm/gcc-l/g...01/gcc-030105/ good luck. -LC
__________________ Asking the right question is sometimes more important than knowing the answer. Please read the FAQ C Reference Card (A MUST!) Pointers and Memory The Essentials CString lib |
| Lynux-Penguin is offline | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Profiler Valgrind | afflictedd2 | C++ Programming | 4 | 07-18-2008 09:38 AM |
| How does compiler/linker such as GCC decide to start locating the appropriate library | shong9 | C Programming | 4 | 09-02-2007 08:47 PM |
| advanced math library for linux? | Cobras2 | Linux Programming | 5 | 07-18-2005 12:20 AM |
| gcc | DavidP | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 21 | 10-22-2003 03:46 PM |
| Formatting Output | Aakash Datt | C++ Programming | 2 | 05-16-2003 08:20 PM |