Question 'bout gcc and kernel

Jaguar · 11-08-2002, 11:17 AM

1. I downloaded gcc-3.2.tar.gz from gnu.org, I untarred and unzipped it. Then follow with commands...
#./configure
#make
#make install
But gcc/g++ does not work at all. What I did wrong?
My previous version is gcc-2.96.

2. How to rebuild kernel? Please anyone give me any web sites providing that (Red Hat 7.2 with downloaded patch-2.4.19.gz).

Jaguar · 11-18-2002, 10:59 AM

Please anyone give me the answer. At least for the first question.

Thanks

unixOZ · 11-18-2002, 12:58 PM

Did you erase your previous version of GCC???
We need more details in order to help you

Jaguar · 11-19-2002, 01:15 AM

I did not erase the previous version and I put new version in a new directory.
It works when I go with a small program like "hello world".
But when the code is a little bigger it doesn't work.
Such as a single source file consisting 2 functions, it can't be compiled anyway.
Compiler always gives the same error message for all source...

/tmp/ccI6FhAV.o(.eh_frame+0x11): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Note that all tested files are very simple.
And all of them were tested with gcc-2.96, they are ok.
(My platform is Redhat 7.2)

In addition, I can't get source file compiled and I don't know how to remove new gcc (make uninstall is not supported) I want to go back to the previous version (gcc-2.96) sometimes?

Thanks

DarkViper · 11-20-2002, 03:39 PM

ok, this is dumb, remember this, when upgrading to a new version (im talking full numbers here, like your old one was 2.9 right? the new one is 3.1, see, a different full number) it means thats its almost a complete rebuild, and you WILL have to uninstall it in order to work. its the sanme with all programs.cept that flash mx can be on the same comp as flash 5 and still work, but thats probably one of the very few exceptions.

hope ive been a help.

DarkViper · 11-20-2002, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkViper
ok, this is dumb, remember this, when upgrading to a new version (im talking full numbers here, like your old one was 2.9 right? the new one is 3.1, see, a different full number) it means thats its almost a complete rebuild, and you WILL have to uninstall it in order to work. its the sanme with all programs.cept that flash mx can be on the same comp as flash 5 and still work, but thats probably one of the very few exceptions.

hope ive been a help.

sorry,meant 3.2. and i cant edit my own posts >

11-08-2002, 11:17 AM	#1
Jaguar still a n00b Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 187	Question 'bout gcc and kernel 1. I downloaded gcc-3.2.tar.gz from gnu.org, I untarred and unzipped it. Then follow with commands... #./configure #make #make install But gcc/g++ does not work at all. What I did wrong? My previous version is gcc-2.96. 2. How to rebuild kernel? Please anyone give me any web sites providing that (Red Hat 7.2 with downloaded patch-2.4.19.gz). __________________ slackware 10.0; kernel 2.6.7 gcc 3.4.0; glibc 2.3.2; vim editor migrating to freebsd 5.4 Last edited by Jaguar; 11-19-2002 at 01:24 AM.
Jaguar is offline

11-18-2002, 10:59 AM	#2
Jaguar still a n00b Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 187	Please anyone give me the answer. At least for the first question. Thanks __________________ slackware 10.0; kernel 2.6.7 gcc 3.4.0; glibc 2.3.2; vim editor migrating to freebsd 5.4
Jaguar is offline

11-18-2002, 12:58 PM	#3
unixOZ Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 91	Did you erase your previous version of GCC??? We need more details in order to help you
unixOZ is offline

11-19-2002, 01:15 AM	#4
Jaguar still a n00b Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 187	I did not erase the previous version and I put new version in a new directory. It works when I go with a small program like "hello world". But when the code is a little bigger it doesn't work. Such as a single source file consisting 2 functions, it can't be compiled anyway. Compiler always gives the same error message for all source... /tmp/ccI6FhAV.o(.eh_frame+0x11): undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Note that all tested files are very simple. And all of them were tested with gcc-2.96, they are ok. (My platform is Redhat 7.2) In addition, I can't get source file compiled and I don't know how to remove new gcc (make uninstall is not supported) I want to go back to the previous version (gcc-2.96) sometimes? Thanks __________________ slackware 10.0; kernel 2.6.7 gcc 3.4.0; glibc 2.3.2; vim editor migrating to freebsd 5.4 Last edited by Jaguar; 11-19-2002 at 12:10 PM.
Jaguar is offline

11-20-2002, 03:39 PM	#5
DarkViper Emotionally Unstable Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 343	ok, this is dumb, remember this, when upgrading to a new version (im talking full numbers here, like your old one was 2.9 right? the new one is 3.1, see, a different full number) it means thats its almost a complete rebuild, and you WILL have to uninstall it in order to work. its the sanme with all programs.cept that flash mx can be on the same comp as flash 5 and still work, but thats probably one of the very few exceptions. hope ive been a help. __________________ ~DJ DarkViper signing out ---------------------------------------- My Site: Black Jaguar Studios Languages: Fluent English, Starter German, HTML, Javascript, Actionscript, Intermediate PHP Verteran Despiser of: ASP, Java, BASIC, Pascal, Cobalt
DarkViper is offline

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
question - linux - gcc - c standards	AMAMH	C Programming	12	12-03-2009 02:49 AM
GCC and SSE multplication	Kernel Sanders	C Programming	5	09-19-2008 05:08 PM
Profiler Valgrind	afflictedd2	C++ Programming	4	07-18-2008 09:38 AM
Including kernel header files	carmaa	C Programming	0	02-03-2008 03:43 PM
GCC bool undefined	Stack Overflow	Linux Programming	3	07-06-2004 12:54 PM