![]() |
| | #1 |
| User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 496
| My (sucky) website At first I tried making my own theme, but I gave up after I realized I could make everything move to where I wanted, but I just don't have an artistic eye. So, I grabbed a theme from Google Pages, and modified it a bit. (By the way, I took that picture in the header at Deception Pass, WA.) Also, I think there's going to be some browser compatibility issues (tested it with Firefox 2.0 RC2 on Mac, don't have IE to test). There's also an issue with the fonts being too large and then having the menu wrap around (happens on Safari 2.0, not on Firefox). [edit] I think I've fixed the problem of menu wrapping... tell me if it still persists [/edit] I'm thinking about implementing a flexible width page, although this doesn't work correctly in IE if I've been informed correctly. So, although I put time and effort into my website, I still don't think it looks very good. http://righton.thruhere.net Last edited by joeprogrammer; 10-15-2006 at 06:11 PM. |
| joeprogrammer is offline | |
| | #2 |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,342
| The layout looks like a blog. |
| Queatrix is offline | |
| | #3 |
| Cat without Hat Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,492
| It looks decent. Is the pretty URL worth the site trying to open a pop-up, though? (Not that it actually manages to ...)
__________________ All the buzzt! CornedBee"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code." - Flon's Law |
| CornedBee is offline | |
| | #4 | ||
| User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 496
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| joeprogrammer is offline | |
| | #5 |
| MENTAL DETECTOR Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 3,295
| > I think I've fixed the problem of menu wrapping... tell me if it still persists IE 6 is probably just being evil, but the menu is wrapped on my screen. I find the layout very clean and easy to read, so I wouldn't change much. It even works for me on a deeper level; I think the design fits the content. |
| whiteflags is offline | |
| | #6 | |
| User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 496
| Quote:
I've just added a counter so everyone can see how popular (or unpopular) my website is. edit: thanks, citizen. Added 100px to width and centered menubar, is it fixed now? Last edited by joeprogrammer; 10-15-2006 at 08:49 PM. | |
| joeprogrammer is offline | |
| | #7 |
| MENTAL DETECTOR Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: United States
Posts: 3,295
| [edit] Looking good, Joe! It's been fixed now. Last edited by whiteflags; 10-16-2006 at 10:12 AM. |
| whiteflags is offline | |
| | #8 |
| Reverse Engineer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Estonia
Posts: 2,260
| I don't like the big fat blue footer. Everything else is OK.
__________________ The duck is irrelevant to my point. |
| maxorator is offline | |
| | #9 | |
| and the hat of marbles Join Date: May 2002 Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 2,041
| The math articles have stuff missing, for example: Quote:
__________________ Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Reason: Time travelling | |
| Sang-drax is offline | |
| | #10 | ||
| User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Canada
Posts: 496
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| joeprogrammer is offline | |
| | #11 |
| Reverse Engineer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Estonia
Posts: 2,260
| It would look better on one line.
__________________ The duck is irrelevant to my point. |
| maxorator is offline | |
| | #12 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 416
| I was going to say it can't suck as bad as mine, but I might be wrong about that ![]() while I like the dark background, the header and footer aren't displaying well for me in mozilla's Seamonkey, the contrast isn't there to show up on the screen. check the css I used on my site, it actually fixes the navigation on the top of the screen so you don't lose it even when scrolling. There are only two pages to my site that require scrolling, so you would have to search all 6 or 7 pages to find them ![]() The first line on my site pages, which is an xml declaration rather than a doctype, actually makes the css and xhtml work for every browser that supports css and xhtml. [ it throws IE into quirks mode and allows it to render the pages right ] [ no browser issues ]My site.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| Jaqui is offline | |
| | #13 |
| Reverse Engineer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Estonia
Posts: 2,260
| Well, I like clean designs so I think Jaqui's site looks quite nice.
__________________ The duck is irrelevant to my point. |
| maxorator is offline | |
| | #14 | ||
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 416
| Quote:
![]() I also prefer a clean site with minimal page content that isn't directly applicable to the site. I'm working on tweaking a css based menu for it, with a tabbed layout, just to show that full "dynamic" menus can be done without using active clientside scripting.
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| Jaqui is offline | |
| | #15 |
| Reverse Engineer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Estonia
Posts: 2,260
| I have seen multilevel drop-down menus that only use CSS. I don't know if they're worth the mess, but it's so cool it can be done without JS. The only problem is that IE6 supports :hover and some other pseudo-classes only for <a> element. You'd need an extra javascript thingy for it to work with IE6.
__________________ The duck is irrelevant to my point. |
| maxorator is offline | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How's my new Website | asbo60 | General Discussions | 53 | 07-10-2009 10:10 AM |
| Parasing website data : intermitten rubbish characters retrived | hanhao | Windows Programming | 4 | 07-31-2007 05:31 PM |