Thread: Timestamp on posts

  1. 10-23-2014 #1
    anduril462
    anduril462 is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    5,909

    Timestamp on posts

    I guess this is largely directed at webmaster...

    IIRC, when I started here (4 years ago already!), the time stamps on posts used to be absolute, a typical YYYY-MM-YY HH:MM format.

    Now, they're relative (N hours/days/weeks/months ago), which bugs the crap out of me, especially since the granularity decreases as time goes on. Two posts that were "1 week ago" may have been 5 min apart, or maybe 5 days. Furthermore, if I get distracted by work or something, I have to reload the page to know just how old something really is, instead of just looking at the time stamp.

    I don't see where I can set time stamp format in my account settings, but I'd really like to go back to absolute time stamps. Does anybody know if this is possible? If not, can webmaster make timestamp format an option?

    EDIT:
    I also seem to remember hovering over the relative time stamp would show you the absolute one, but this seems to be gone too, or maybe just my memory is gone
  2. 10-23-2014 #2
    phantomotap
    phantomotap is offline
    Master Apprentice phantomotap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    O_o

    Once upon a time, "vBulletin" had a perfect time module.

    People were shown relative time with a hover context showing absolute time using Javascript where enabled to adjust for local time even if a person wasn't signed in with an account.

    *shrug*

    The nearest you can get for now, as far as I know, is using the print view which currently at least shows the date for near relative threads.

    [Edit]
    That is, once you go back far enough the absolute date is shown by default as far as I can tell.
    [/Edit]

    [Edit]
    "Thread Tools" -> "Show Printable Version"
    [/Edit]

    Soma
    “Salem Was Wrong!” -- Pedant Necromancer
    “Four isn't random!” -- Gibbering Mouther
  3. 10-23-2014 #3
    Matticus
    Matticus is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,513
    The "Show Printable Version" that phantomotap mentioned is the only way I'm currently aware to get an accurate date.

    I've also noticed "one week ago" could sometimes be up to 16 days or so old.
  4. 10-24-2014 #4
    whiteflags
    whiteflags is offline
    Lurking whiteflags's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,612
    I'm sure it's just a dumb switch webmaster needs to flip
  5. 10-24-2014 #5
    grumpy
    grumpy is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,815
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteflags View Post
    I'm sure it's just a dumb switch webmaster needs to flip
    It is possibly also a change that is hard-coded into the software as shipped. Features being lost in new versions of software are not unusual.
    Right 98% of the time, and don't care about the other 3%.

    If I seem grumpy or unhelpful in reply to you, or tell you you need to demonstrate more effort before you can expect help, it is likely you deserve it. Suck it up, Buttercup, and read this, this, and this before posting again.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. MAC Timestamp
    By kspen in forum Networking/Device Communication
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-18-2012, 02:53 PM
  2. Is this a timestamp?
    By NewnOT in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-21-2010, 03:41 PM
  3. about timestamp
    By George2 in forum C Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2006, 06:59 AM
  4. access timestamp
    By Jalabert in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-02-2005, 08:02 AM
  5. making a timestamp
    By karmatic in forum C Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-11-2003, 10:05 PM