For sure. Science usually advances by debunking old theories.
But a thought experiment doesn't offer any mechanisms to be tested through another thought experiment. It is a construction that is purposely made valid according to available knowledge. As such, in its time, it is always true and never false. What will determine its falsehood is new knowledge gained from hard science. A scientific theory, on the contrary, requires will be evolved or debunked through another scientific theory. The scientific method is built to oversee itself.
Such a thought experiment would be unnecessary. What manner of new scientific knowledge could we gain from a simple logical device? If something new is so obviously true, then we don't need an abstraction to test and validate it. It just is true by sheer deduction.