Did I choose to study the wrong Programming technology (asp.NET)?

This is a discussion on Did I choose to study the wrong Programming technology (asp.NET)? within the General Discussions forums, part of the Community Boards category; I'm currently taking a course on asp.net. the c# part was very fun but now that I am getting into ...

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    71

    Did I choose to study the wrong Programming technology (asp.NET)?

    I'm currently taking a course on asp.net. the c# part was very fun but now that I am getting into all the details of asp.net I wonder if writing the code for web controls is the type of stuff that I want to be doing for who knows how many years to come. I think it's great that in this course hopefully I'll learn how to create 'advanced' web pages, but at the same time I think that working in an environment where I'm building non-web related applications is something that I would enjoy doing a bit more.

    However, given that I've been unemployed for many months and that my main goal right now is to learn a current technology so I can find a job, I wonder whether the asp.net knowledge is the way to go even if web development is not the part of computer programming that excites me the most.

    if I am not mistaken the number of companies that need to hire people to take care of their web sites is much higher than the number of companies that want to hire a guy to build them an application, so I am under the impression that as an asp.net developer my chances of finding meaningful employment would be a lot higher than if I were to learn something else, and I say this not only because of my perception that there are more web development jobs than windows application development jobs but also because web development jobs are probably relatively less competitive. (I think this is an important point to keep in mind given that my professional programming experience is pretty much worthless: archaic technology, maintenance programming.) And then, once I have some relevant programming experience under my belt, even if it's web development, I can hopefully move towards other areas that I personally find more rewarding.

    But I need to know, is my reasoning correct?

    Is there in fact relatively high demand for people with solid knowledge of asp.net?

    Or am I wasting my time learning something that is not going to be of any real use to me and that is going to leave me in the same position I am in right now?
    Last edited by y99q; 10-07-2011 at 11:39 PM.

  2. #2
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    21,662
    Quote Originally Posted by y99q
    Is there in fact relatively high demand for people with solid knowledge of asp.net?
    The answer to this is only relevant if it applies to the area in which you are seeking for a job, so telling us where you intend to work could help, e.g., if one of the members here happens to be familiar with the tech job market in that area.
    C + C++ Compiler: MinGW port of GCC
    Version Control System: Bazaar

    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  3. #3
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ! Elysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,556
    Learning a programming language is always a good thing, as it gives you experience in both programming in general and a specific language.
    I wouldn't say it would be useless. But if it will be much help later is debatable.
    Regardless, having more languages under your belt is always a "+", so don't think of this course as a waste of time.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    86
    Goddamnit it's hard out there right now. I wish you all the luck in the world man, because I know that when I get out there I'll need all the blessings I can get.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    86
    But I have a question for you, what's wrong with archaic technology? At least, if it's mainframe (like cobol, etc) stuff you're talking about, IBM actually scouts my school like crazy looking for new mainframe talent. Unbelievably, that market seems to be going up, as grey haired progammers retire or kick the bucket. Many companies (credit card companies is a notable) use mainframe technology and have no desire to move to different platforms (if it ain't broke...).

    I actually took a c++ course with an older guy who had tons of mainframe experience. I asked why he was taking the course, and he was like, "I'm out of work." So a quick scan of craig's list showed TONS of high paying mainframe work near us. I inquire further, and he says, "I don't want to relocate".

    I could be way off base, but I just thought I'd throw you an example of the "where" being more important than the "what".

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Which concentration to choose in programming
    By camel-man in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-06-2011, 09:41 AM
  2. Computer programming technology from decades past
    By Akkernight in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 03:59 AM
  3. New to C programming, what am i doing wrong?
    By adambeck in forum C Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-28-2008, 11:54 PM
  4. what could be wrong with this programming?
    By henrion2003 in forum C Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-12-2007, 09:38 PM
  5. rochester institude of technology and wentworth institute of technology
    By Shadow12345 in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-20-2003, 10:41 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21