25Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksJust remember, above all....DON'T PANIC
This is a discussion on Request: Auto-lock! within the General Discussions forums, part of the Community Boards category; Just remember, above all....DON'T PANIC...
Just remember, above all....DON'T PANIC
Originally Posted by anduril462
Warning: Some or all of my posted code may be non-standard and as such should not be used and in no case looked at.
To laserlight's point, it seems in the rare occasion that somebody has something useful and positive to add to an old, incorrect thread that has been auto-locked, that they could request special permission from a moderator. Or make a large post count (in the hundreds) a prerequisite to commenting on old threads if that's somehow possible. Honestly, in the 8 months I've been here, I've seen dozens of threads resurrected, and not a single one of these necromancers has contributed anything useful to the thread. The vast majority of the bumps seem to be "I have this homework too, can you email me your solution", and the rest seem to be new comers who think they can build rep points or something by simply rephrasing the already-more-than-good-enough answers given a year ago.
Right on cue, another typical example
-> Problem with #include "stdafx.h"
If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.
I support http://www.ukip.org/ as the first necessary step to a free Europe.
OTOH, why don't just moderators split replies from old topics they feel is not appropriate there? This is a counter argument against merging new threads into old topics if they feel necessary.
For information on how to enable C++11 on your compiler, look here.
よく聞くがいい！私は天才だからね！ ^_^
Splitting the topic doesn't prevent or age a bumped thread.
I don't know--I think that depends on the forum software.
For information on how to enable C++11 on your compiler, look here.
よく聞くがいい！私は天才だからね！ ^_^
I've seen threads be split on here before, so I do know.
This is a good suggestion. The basic "prevent replies to old threads" should be quite doable; I will look into it.
He's got a TOWEL... run away... run away!!Just remember, above all....DON'T PANIC
I've implemented a very simple version of this. Any still-open thread that hasn't been touched in the last 31 days is automatically displayed as "locked" unless you are a moderator or the thread is a sticky.
Technical details: I was able to add this as a custom vBulletin plugin, making upgrades easy. I also didn't really change the "locked" status in the database (for safety). Everything is dynamically computed, but no additional db queries are required.
Please let me know if you run into any weird behavior as a result of this.
Wouldn't the 'Closed' button be the first place anyone(trying to bump) would click?
I found that, clicking the button is opening the reply page. (Please ignore this, if the 'reply' is prevented after hitting submit on that page).
Manasij Mukherjee | gcc-4.8.0 @Arch Linux
Slow and Steady wins the race... if and only if :
1.None of the other participants are fast and steady.
2.The fast and unsteady suddenly falls asleep while running !
Would "not being able to find any messages older than 31 days" count?
Anything beyond "4 weeks" appears to have vanished...
@manasij7479 Oops, that's a good point! Let me see about that...
@CommonTater I don't think that's the case--your profile likely is set to show only messages within the last month. (I ran into this in my testing.)
Thanks for pointing that out... Handy setting!
I've updated the display so that there are no longer links to the reply page for closed threads.
