hehe goodunvoid main()
hehe goodunvoid main()
Yeah. But the point being you are really aiming too high the geek thing. And you don't want to be a geek that looks like a geek.Originally Posted by Aisthesis
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
Fer sure. That model looks like he could use a gym and some sunshine
C programming resources:
GNU C Function and Macro Index -- glibc reference manual
The C Book -- nice online learner guide
Current ISO draft standard
CCAN -- new CPAN like open source library repository
3 (different) GNU debugger tutorials: #1 -- #2 -- #3
cpwiki -- our wiki on sourceforge
Shouldn't that be an error?tshirt.cpp: warning: 'obscure programming joke' undefined
Yeah, but I thought about the consequences, and decided that the shirt wouldn't exist should there be an error. So the shirt compiled, but there's no joke on it. Well, technically there is... it's sort of a paradox.Shouldn't that be an error?
Consider this post signed
How bad will it be if someone tells you "Dude, you have one big bug on your t-shirt!"?
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
"This t-shirt intentionally left blank"
Consider this post signed
Code:// TODO: Add something cool here.
"I am probably the laziest programmer on the planet, a fact with which anyone who has ever seen my code will agree." - esbo, 11/15/2008
"the internet is a scary place to be thats why i dont use it much." - billet, 03/17/2010
Some of my fav coding t-shirts that I've seen at work:
Code:while (awake) { code(); }I'm not slacking off...my code is compiling.
Bubba: Do I have your permission to use that one?
I think I'd go with that on back and a more simplified formulation of the P v NP problem on front (namely P not equal NP rather than the set-theoretical one with NPC)
Show me proof.
Aisthesis has discovered a truly marvelous proof of that, but the T-shirt is too narrow to contain it.
Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
BTW, defending P != NP makes as much sense as defending P = NP, which is: It makes no sense at all.
P != NP appears to me also very self-conceited by treating current human abilities as pretty much all we ever need in order to advance science indefinitely. It also brushes against my own nihilistic beliefs.
Regardless, supporting one position or another without what constitutes yet real proof is definitely rather unscientific. You may as well put malformed code on the back of the t-shirt to go with it. It would be more coherent.
And, btw, by believing in P != NP without the ability to prove it, one is in fact making a strong case for P = NP.
EDIT: Eh, seems DavidP had the same thought while i was writing this. This post is meant for Aisthesis.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
I do not see how that is the case.
Anyway, an easy fix is to ask instead: P = NP ?
Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
