I note that your original assertion included "random" keyboard banging. Do you still include that, or do you now believe that the input should be restricted to natural language text?Originally Posted by MK27
I think that this is where my doubt lies: is this assertion a self-evident statement of fact, or is it just an unproven hypothesis?Originally Posted by MK27
But let's move on: suppose I wanted to test this statement. What do you propose is the best way for me to obtain the data and convert it to a byte array such that it can be checked with a statistical test of randomness?
If I remember correctly, this is debatable, and physicists tend to be in favour of the proposition that it is the case that it is physically impossible to make such a prediction, regardless of the technical knowledge and apparatus available. Unfortunately, the actual physics discussion is somewhat beyond me.Originally Posted by MK27