NeonBlack

A week and a half ago, I started a new personal project using mingw and so far I have encountered several bugs which produced incorrect compiled code.

So what I'll typically do in a case like this is make a copy of the file and starting paring it down in chunks to create the Smallest Compilable Example which Demonstrates the Problem (R).

But as some point, the code would start compiling correctly and so would the original code.

The example from yesterday that pushed me over the edge: What I originally wrote was something like this:
But the condition kept failing, and i kept decrementing into negative numbers. I changed it to
and it worked the way it was supposed to. I changed it back, and the same thing happened!

I copied the file and started deleting other methods and class variables without touching the offending part of the code, recompiling after every big chunk I deleted and at some point, it start working correctly. I recompiled the original code, and it worked too!

This is not the first time this has happened, and since I can't reproduce the problem, I can't even file a bug.

I just came on to complain and to say "Sayonara, GCC!"

__________________
I copied it from the last program in which I passed a parameter, which would have been pre-1989 I guess. - esbo

laserlight

Which version of the MinGW port of GCC are you using? I noticed that the official 4.4.0 version is still pretty buggy.

__________________
C + C++ Compiler: MinGW port of GCC
Build + Version Control System: SCons + Bazaar

Look up a C/C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

DavidP

hmm. I've never had any problems with bugs in GCC.

__________________
My Website

"Circular logic is good because it is."

NeonBlack

Hey laserlight. It's 4.3.3 from the package I downloaded here because I found that building boost was a PITA.

Looking closer at that site, I just realized that it includes the TDM GCC build. I did not notice that before. I had been using the previous version since last spring with no problems.

So maybe I'll try a previous version of the main build until it gives me problems.

Thanks! I wouldn't have seen that if I hadn't gone back to the site. (It said tdm in --version, but I ignored it as part of a huge meaningless string of letters )

__________________
I copied it from the last program in which I passed a parameter, which would have been pre-1989 I guess. - esbo

DavidP

If you can get the bug to reproduce, you should immediately open up the assembly dump and post the assembly code here, 'cause I'd be interesting in seeing the assembly generated. You can do this by calling:

objdump -d [executable file name]

on the command line.

__________________
My Website

"Circular logic is good because it is."

glo

You didn't say what n was, is it initialized? in which case, to what? and where?